Lt. Joginder Singh (deceased) through LRs Vs Rajesh Sood CMP No. 3805 of 2026 in RSA No. 119 of 2023 10.07.2026 Present: None for the non­applicants. Ms. Vandana Kumari, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate, for the applicant. The present application has been moved in decided RSA No. 119 of 2023, which was dismissed by this Court on 30.12.2025. As per the application, the decreetal amount of Rs. 6,50,000/­ along with interest be released in favour of applicant Rajesh Sood. As per the report of Registry, the decreetal amount i.e. Rs. 6,50,000/­ has been deposited. Despite sufficient opportunities, reply to the application has not been filed, meaning thereby, they have nothing to say against the prayer as made in the application. Considering the fact that after the dismissal of the appeal sufficient time has been lapsed. As such, there is no justification to decline the prayer of the applicant. Accordingly, the application is allowed and the amount so deposited by the non­applicants is ordered to be released along with upto date interest, to the applicant. The amount so released shall be remitted to the bank account of the applicant, particular of which have been mentioned in para 4, of the application. Application accordingly disposed of. It is further clarified that the release of the amount is subject to the outcome of the appeal, if any, the non­applicants would prefer before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. ( Virender Singh ) Judge 10th July, 2026

(Pramod Kumar)

Lt. Joginder Singh (deceased) through LRs Vs Rajesh Sood CMP No. 3805 of 2026 in RSA No. 119 of 2023 10.07.2026 Present: None for the non­applicants. Ms. Vandana Kumari, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate, for the applicant. The present application has been moved in decided RSA No. 119 of 2023, which was dismissed by this Court on 30.12.2025. As per the application, the decreetal amount of Rs. 6,50,000/­ along with interest be released in favour of applicant Rajesh Sood. As per the report of Registry, the decreetal amount i.e. Rs. 6,50,000/­ has been deposited. Despite sufficient opportunities, reply to the application has not been filed, meaning thereby, they have nothing to say against the prayer as made in the application. Considering the fact that after the dismissal of the appeal sufficient time has been lapsed. As such, there is no justification to decline the prayer of the applicant. Accordingly, the application is allowed and the amount so deposited by the non­applicants is ordered to be released along with upto date interest, to the applicant. The amount so released shall be remitted to the bank account of the applicant, particular of which have been mentioned in para 4, of the application. Application accordingly disposed of. It is further clarified that the release of the amount is subject to the outcome of the appeal, if any, the non­applicants would prefer before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. ( Virender Singh ) Judge 10th July, 2026

(Pramod Kumar)