IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr. MP(M) No.1179 of 2026 Date of Decision: 03.07.2026 ________________________________________________________________ Sh. Tilak Raj .....Applicant/Petitioner Versus Sh. Rajeev Kumar and Another ..…Respondents ________________________________________________________________ Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________________________ For the Applicant/Petitioner: Mr. Sat Parkash, Advocate. For the Respondent: None. ________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel representing the applicant/petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant application, with liberty to file afresh, in the appropriate Court of law, if required and desired. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma) Judge 03rd July, 2026 Rajeev Raturi 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr. MP(M) No.1179 of 2026 Date of Decision: 03.07.2026 ________________________________________________________________ Sh. Tilak Raj .....Applicant/Petitioner Versus Sh. Rajeev Kumar and Another ..…Respondents ________________________________________________________________ Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________________________ For the Applicant/Petitioner: Mr. Sat Parkash, Advocate. For the Respondent: None. ________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel representing the applicant/petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant application, with liberty to file afresh, in the appropriate Court of law, if required and desired. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma) Judge 03rd July, 2026 Rajeev Raturi 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?