IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 6399 of 2024. Decided on : 2 nd July, 2026. Perminder kumari & Ors. ...Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. & Anr. ....Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Ms. Anuja Mehta, Advocate For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Addl. Advocate General and Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral). Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to technical flaw in the present petition, petitioner be permitted to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. 2. Prayer being innocuous is allowed. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge 2nd July, 2026. (jai) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 6399 of 2024. Decided on : 2 nd July, 2026. Perminder kumari & Ors. ...Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. & Anr. ....Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Ms. Anuja Mehta, Advocate For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Addl. Advocate General and Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral). Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to technical flaw in the present petition, petitioner be permitted to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. 2. Prayer being innocuous is allowed. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge 2nd July, 2026. (jai) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?