Himachal Pradesh High Court

Vinod Kumar v. State of HP

CRMPM/1004/2026

Decision date: 2026-06-29
Text availability: Full text
Judges: Sandeep Sharma

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MP(M) No.1004 of 2026 Date of Decision: 29.6.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Vinod Kumar ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Munish Dhatwalia and Mr. Ram Kumar, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol Additional Advocate General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Respondent-State has filed status report and HC Ajay Kumar, has come present with record. Record perused and returned. 2. Having perused status report, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition at this stage with liberty to file fresh at appropriate stage, if required and desired. 3. Ordered accordingly. June 29, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Vinod Kumar v. State of HP

CRMPM/1004/2026

Decision date: 2026-06-29
Text availability: Full text
Judges: Sandeep Sharma

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MP(M) No.1004 of 2026 Date of Decision: 29.6.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Vinod Kumar ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Munish Dhatwalia and Mr. Ram Kumar, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol Additional Advocate General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Respondent-State has filed status report and HC Ajay Kumar, has come present with record. Record perused and returned. 2. Having perused status report, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition at this stage with liberty to file fresh at appropriate stage, if required and desired. 3. Ordered accordingly. June 29, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge