1 2026:HHC:25124 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 738 of 2026 Decided on: 29.06.2026 ________________________________________________ Mehar Singh ....Petitioner Versus Er. Anju Sharma …Respondent _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Sunil Dutt Gautam and Mr. Harmohan Thakur, Advocates. For the respondent : Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 25.06.2026, wherein, it has been stated that the respondent department has complied with the judgment dated 24.12.2025, passed in CWP No.20317 of 2025 in its letter and spirit. 2. Since judgment under reference stands duly complied with, therefore, no further orders are required to be 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:25124 passed in the present contempt petition and the matter is closed. 3. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy, as available to him under the law. 4. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 29th June, 2026 Judge (Kiran)

1 2026:HHC:25124 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 738 of 2026 Decided on: 29.06.2026 ________________________________________________ Mehar Singh ....Petitioner Versus Er. Anju Sharma …Respondent _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Sunil Dutt Gautam and Mr. Harmohan Thakur, Advocates. For the respondent : Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 25.06.2026, wherein, it has been stated that the respondent department has complied with the judgment dated 24.12.2025, passed in CWP No.20317 of 2025 in its letter and spirit. 2. Since judgment under reference stands duly complied with, therefore, no further orders are required to be 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:25124 passed in the present contempt petition and the matter is closed. 3. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy, as available to him under the law. 4. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 29th June, 2026 Judge (Kiran)