IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Petition No.1157 of 2026 in CWP No.2795 of 2025 Decided on: 23.06.2026. Sh. Ram Pal … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner : Mr. Rajat Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Issue notice. Mr. Rajat Chauhan, learned Assistant Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Learned Assistant Advocate General submits that appropriate orders in terms of the judgment in issue shall positively be passed by the Authority concerned within a period of four weeks from today. His statement is taken on record. 2. In view of the above, these proceedings are accordingly closed. 3. For compliance, list on 20.07.2026. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 23, 2026 (Vinod) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Petition No.1157 of 2026 in CWP No.2795 of 2025 Decided on: 23.06.2026. Sh. Ram Pal … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner : Mr. Rajat Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Issue notice. Mr. Rajat Chauhan, learned Assistant Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Learned Assistant Advocate General submits that appropriate orders in terms of the judgment in issue shall positively be passed by the Authority concerned within a period of four weeks from today. His statement is taken on record. 2. In view of the above, these proceedings are accordingly closed. 3. For compliance, list on 20.07.2026. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 23, 2026 (Vinod) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?