1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 15178 of 2024 Decided on: 19.06.2026 M/s Sirmour Industries …..Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ..Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Balram Sharma, DSGI, for respondent No.1. Mr. L.N. Sharma, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No. 2 & 3. -------------------------------------------------------------------------Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submitted that grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition related to notice issued to petitioner on 16.09.2024 (Annexure P-5) by respondent- State Forest Department. The said notice was based upon a notification No. 168 dated 13.01.2022 issued by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (respondent No.1) under Section 3 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 read with rules framed thereunder, 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2

in terms of which, specified area around the boundary of Col. Sher Jung National Park in Sirmour District was notified as Eco-sensitive zone. Accordingly, petitioner was directed to discontinue the operation of its stone crusher and mining lease on the land falling within the ambit of notification. Learned Senior Counsel further submits that in Gram Panchayat Bhatanwali & others versus Union of India and others2, the notification dated 13.01.2022 has been quashed and set-aside, therefore, notice impugned in the instant writ petition dated 16.09.2024 that was in turn based upon notification dated 13.01.2022 has also lost its relevance. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents acknowledged the above submissions in law and facts. 3. In view of above, this writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua June 19, 2026 Judge yogesh 2CWP No.9434/2025, decided on 16.04.2026

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 15178 of 2024 Decided on: 19.06.2026 M/s Sirmour Industries …..Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ..Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Balram Sharma, DSGI, for respondent No.1. Mr. L.N. Sharma, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No. 2 & 3. -------------------------------------------------------------------------Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submitted that grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition related to notice issued to petitioner on 16.09.2024 (Annexure P-5) by respondent- State Forest Department. The said notice was based upon a notification No. 168 dated 13.01.2022 issued by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (respondent No.1) under Section 3 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 read with rules framed thereunder, 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2

in terms of which, specified area around the boundary of Col. Sher Jung National Park in Sirmour District was notified as Eco-sensitive zone. Accordingly, petitioner was directed to discontinue the operation of its stone crusher and mining lease on the land falling within the ambit of notification. Learned Senior Counsel further submits that in Gram Panchayat Bhatanwali & others versus Union of India and others2, the notification dated 13.01.2022 has been quashed and set-aside, therefore, notice impugned in the instant writ petition dated 16.09.2024 that was in turn based upon notification dated 13.01.2022 has also lost its relevance. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents acknowledged the above submissions in law and facts. 3. In view of above, this writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua June 19, 2026 Judge yogesh 2CWP No.9434/2025, decided on 16.04.2026