Gujarat High Court

Pradip Kumar Vaishnav Das Kapoor v. State of Gujarat

CR.MA/4337/2023

Decision date
2026-07-06
Text availability
Full text
Judges
P. M. Raval

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

R/CR.MA/4337/2023 ORDER DATED: 06/07/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION (DIRECTION) NO. 4337 of 2023 ================================================ PRADIP KUMAR VAISHNAV DAS KAPOOR Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. ================================================ Appearance: MR NISHITH P THAKKAR(2836) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MS ASHA D TIWARI(2983) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR ROHAN SHAH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ================================================ CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL Date : 06/07/2026 ORAL ORDER 1. Record reveals that on 08.11.2023, when the matter was taken up by the coordinate Bench, learned advocate for the applicant was not present. By the said order, the coordinate Bench Bench directed to take on record the Report forwarded by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural) of learned 3rd Additional Senior Civil Judge and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad (Rural) and produced by the Registry. 2. From a perusal of the said Report, it reveals that the learned Page 1 of 2 R/CR.MA/4337/2023 ORDER DATED: 06/07/2026 Magistrate had already sent a Notice dated 04.11.2023 to the complainant – applicant herein informing to remain present before the Court on 06.11.2023 with all the documents relating to the case, however, the complainant did not turn up before the Court nor submitted any papers for reconstruction.

3. Today also, when the matter is called out, the learned advocate for the applicant – complainant is not present. 4. The matter is of 2023 and pending since then for necessary direction. 5. In the given facts and circumstances of the case, this application is being disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the complainant – applicant herein to prefer appropriate application before the trial Court concerned for reconstruction and to cooperate in the same. 5.1 The application stands disposed of, accordingly. [ P. M. Raval, J. ] hiren/5tss6726 Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: HIREN VIRENDRABHAI MER(HC00351), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 06/07/2026 13:51:25 Page 2 of 2