Gauhati High Court

The Rongpur Cooperative Society Ltd. & Anr. v. Sri Abid Raja Laskar & Ors.

2026:GAU-AS:13691-DB · WA/278/2026

Decision date
2026-09-15
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Chief Justice, Arun Dev Choudhury

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010162392026 2026:GAU-AS:13691-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WA/278/2026 THE RONGPUR COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. AND ANR. REPRESENTED BY CHAIRMAN OF THE SOCIETY, VILLAGE AND P.O. GOSSAIPUR PART-III, P.S. UDHARBOND, DISTRICT CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN-788030 2: SRI RAM JANOM CHOUHAN CHAIRMAN OF RONGPUR COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. VILLAGE AND P.O. GOSSAIPUR PART-III P.S. UDHARBOND DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM PIN-78803 -VERSUS- SRI ABID RAJA LASKAR AND 7 ORS. S/O. LATE BINOD RAJA LASKAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- GOSSAIPUR PART-III, P.O. UDHARBOND, DIST- CACHAR, ASSAM. 2:SRI NASIR UDDIN MAZARBHUIYA S/O LT. KUTIMIYA MAZARBHUIYA RESIDENT OFVILLAGE GOSSAIPUR PART-III P.O. UDHARBOND DIST- CACHAR ASSAM. Page No.# 2/3 3:SRI AKHTAR UDDIN LASKAR S/O LT. AYUB ALI LASKAR RESIDENT OFVILLAGE- GOSSAIPUR PART-III P.O. UDHARBOND DIST- CACHAR ASSAM 4:SRI ABU BAKKAR BARBHUIYA S/O LT. RAJA MIYA BARBHUIYA RESIDENT OF- VILLAGE GOSSAIPUR PART-III P.O. UDHARBOND DIST-CACHAR ASSAM. 5:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM COOPERATION DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 6:THE REGISTRAR CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ASSAM 7:THE ZONAL JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES CACHAR SRIBHUMI HAILAKANDI ZONE SILCHAR DIST.-CACHAR ASSAM. 8:THE ASSITANT REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY CACHAR SILCHAR DIST- CACHAR ASSAM

For the appellants : Mr. M.U. Mahmud, Advocate Page No.# 3/3 – B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY 16-09-2026 (Ashutosh Kumar, C.J.) Mr. M.U. Mahmud, learned Advocate for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw this appeal. Accordingly, this writ appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant