Gauhati High Court

Taj Uddin Mazumder v. The Union of India & Ors.

WP(C)/3664/2026

Decision date
2026-07-16
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Manish Choudhury

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010139712026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3664/2026 TAJ UDDIN MAZUMDER S/O TURFAN ALI MAZUMDER, VILLAGE-RONGPUR PART-I, P.O. DAYAPUR, P.S. SILCHAR, DISTRICT CACHAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT HIGHWAYS, TRANSPORT BHAWAN-1, PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI 110001. 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAMREVENUE DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTDISPURGUWAHATI 781006. 3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER COMPETENT AUTHORITY OF LAND ACQUISITION CACHARSILCHAR. 4:THE CO DISTRICT COMMISSIONER COMPETENT AUTHORITY OF LAND ACQUISITION CACHARSILCHAR. 5:THE ARBITRATOR REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAMREVENUE DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTDISPURGUWAHATI 781006. Page No.# 2/2 6:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD LAKHIPUR BARKHOLA AND KATIGORAH TERRITORIAL BUILDING DIVISIONCACHARSILCHAR. 7:THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD NHIDCL REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGERNHIDCLCACHARSILCHA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. SAYED SALIM AHMED, MS S DAS,MR H R A CHOUDHURY,MR F U BARBHUIYA Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC. REVENUE,SC, PWD,SC, NHIDC,GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 17-07-2026

Mr. S.S. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted, on instructions, that the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty. Mr. A. Bhattacharyya, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department; Ms. M. Barman, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam and Mrs. R. Borah, learned counsel for the respondent no. 7 are present. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal, with liberty. JUDGE Comparing Assistant