Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010090952026 2026:GAU-AS:8451 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/955/2026 SANJIT NATH AND ANR S/O LATE KUMUD BANDHU NATH 2: SMTI. RUMPI NATH W/O SANJIT NATH BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF H. NO. 7 LOKHRA ROAD BACKSIDE OF BAJRANG ROLLING MILLS P.S. FATASIL AMBARI P.O. UDALBAKRA DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN-781034 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. I H LASKAR, MR. R. KARIM,MR. P DAIMARY,MR. P K DEKA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 2/2 -BEFORE- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER 12.06.2026 Heard Mr. P.K. Deka, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State respondent. The learned Addl. P.P. has submitted that the updated case diary along with the statements of the present petitioners has been received. On perusal of the same, this Court finds that the custodial interrogation of the petitioners would not be required at this stage. Accordingly, the interim protection granted vide order dated 11.05.2026 is hereby made absolute, by allowing the petitioners to privilege of a pre-arrest bail, on the bonds already submitted before the arresting authority.

It is made clear that, if there is any requirement of custodial interrogation of the petitioners, the Investigating Authority would be at liberty to approach this Court for modification. JUDGE Comparing Assistant