$~60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010191552026 + RC.REV. 157/2026, CAV 198/2026, CM APPL. 29454/2026 (Stay), CM APPL. 29455/2026 (Ex.), CM APPL. 29456/2026 (Delay of 20 days in Re-filing the petition) & CM APPL. 50908/2026 (Seeking directions for payment of use and occupation charges during pendency of the present revision petition by Respondent) DEVI CHAND .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw, Mr. Bharat Deepak, Mr. Lalan Sinha, Mr. Ashish Kumar, Ms. Rukmini Rajagopal & Mr. Raghav Dembla, Advs. versus SHRI JAGDISH LAL KHORANA (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LR SHRI SURESH KHORANA .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR O R D E R % 01.09.2026 1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 25B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the Judgment dated 23.01.2026 [―Impugned Judgment‖] passed by the learned SCJ-RC (North District), Rohini Courts, Delhi [―learned RC‖], in RC ARC E. No. 322 of 2016 titled ―Sh. Jagdish Lal Khorana (since deceased) through L. R. –vs- Shri Devi Chand”. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, on This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/09/2026 at 10:25:57 instructions, submit that they are ad idem that the Impugned Judgment may be set aside and the matter be remanded to the learned RC for fresh consideration, with liberty to the parties to seek permission from the learned RC to place on record such further documents and evidence as they may deem appropriate in support of their respective contentions. 3. In view of the aforesaid consensus between the parties, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the respective contentions, the Impugned Judgment is set aside, and the matter is remanded to the learned RC for fresh consideration in accordance with law. 4. The parties shall be at liberty to seek appropriate permission from the learned RC to place on record such further documents and evidence as they may deem fit, which application, if made, shall be considered by the learned RC in accordance with the applicable law. 5. Since the present matter is of considerable vintage, the learned RC is requested to endeavour to dispose of the matter as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of one (01) year from today. 6. List before the learned RC on 10.09.2026. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. SEPTEMBER 1, 2026/v/jk This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/09/2026 at 10:25:57

$~60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010191552026 + RC.REV. 157/2026, CAV 198/2026, CM APPL. 29454/2026 (Stay), CM APPL. 29455/2026 (Ex.), CM APPL. 29456/2026 (Delay of 20 days in Re-filing the petition) & CM APPL. 50908/2026 (Seeking directions for payment of use and occupation charges during pendency of the present revision petition by Respondent) DEVI CHAND .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw, Mr. Bharat Deepak, Mr. Lalan Sinha, Mr. Ashish Kumar, Ms. Rukmini Rajagopal & Mr. Raghav Dembla, Advs. versus SHRI JAGDISH LAL KHORANA (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LR SHRI SURESH KHORANA .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR O R D E R % 01.09.2026 1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 25B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the Judgment dated 23.01.2026 [―Impugned Judgment‖] passed by the learned SCJ-RC (North District), Rohini Courts, Delhi [―learned RC‖], in RC ARC E. No. 322 of 2016 titled ―Sh. Jagdish Lal Khorana (since deceased) through L. R. –vs- Shri Devi Chand”. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, on This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/09/2026 at 10:25:57 instructions, submit that they are ad idem that the Impugned Judgment may be set aside and the matter be remanded to the learned RC for fresh consideration, with liberty to the parties to seek permission from the learned RC to place on record such further documents and evidence as they may deem appropriate in support of their respective contentions. 3. In view of the aforesaid consensus between the parties, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the respective contentions, the Impugned Judgment is set aside, and the matter is remanded to the learned RC for fresh consideration in accordance with law. 4. The parties shall be at liberty to seek appropriate permission from the learned RC to place on record such further documents and evidence as they may deem fit, which application, if made, shall be considered by the learned RC in accordance with the applicable law. 5. Since the present matter is of considerable vintage, the learned RC is requested to endeavour to dispose of the matter as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of one (01) year from today. 6. List before the learned RC on 10.09.2026. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. SEPTEMBER 1, 2026/v/jk This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/09/2026 at 10:25:57