Delhi High Court
Siyaram Meena v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
- Decision date
- 2026-08-11
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Girish Kathpalia
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 11.08.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010300692026 + BAIL APPLN. 2691/2026 & CRL.M.A. 20452/2026 SIYARAM MEENA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Kanwa, Mr. Rohan Wadhwa and Mr. Varun Rawat, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State with SI Yogesh, PS Defence Colony. Mr. Akhil Maan and Mr. Angad Gautam, Advocates for Complainant with Complainant in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 30/2026 of PS Defence Colony for offence under Section 78/79/140(3)/351(3) BNS. 2. Broadly speaking, the allegation against the accused/applicant is that he harassed, threatened, stalked and even abducted the prosecutrix. 3. More significantly, when application of the accused/applicant for cancellation of Non-Bailable Warrants was heard by the trial court, the BAIL APPLN. 2691/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af ou=HIGH COURT GIRISH 3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca,OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996 KATHPALIA KATHPALIA cn=GIRISHDate: 2026.08.11 16:55:04 +05'30'Signature Not Verified b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, Digitally Signed By:DIKSHA RAWAT Signing Date:11.08.2026 17:00:50
accused/applicant falsely furnished his wrong address. The learned trial court in order dated 10.07.2026, while dismissing the application for cancellation of Non-Bailable Warrants, observed thus: “It is pertinent to note that even today despite directions of the Court to furnish complete address of the accused, the accused has furnished the earlier address of Dausa, Rajasthan, wherein there are already statements of relatives of the accused that he does not reside at the said address.” 4. Even in the present petition, the accused/applicant has mentioned his residential address of Dausa, Rajasthan only. 5. Despite repeated queries, learned counsel for accused/applicant is not disclosing the present correct address of the accused/applicant. 6. Therefore, the anticipatory bail application and the accompanying application are dismissed. Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec455 69af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH GIRISH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570 996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, KATHPALIA cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.08.11 16:54:45 +05'30' GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) AUGUST 11, 2026/dr BAIL APPLN. 2691/2026 Page 2 of 2 pages Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:DIKSHA RAWAT Signing Date:11.08.2026 17:00:50