$~88 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2036/2026 & CRL.M.A. 20361/2026 SURAJ KUMAR AND OTHERS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Prakhar Gupta, Advocate (through videoconferencing). versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC for State (through videoconferencing). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R % 15.07.2026 1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 121/2025 of PS Karawal Nagar for offence under Section 69 BNS on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for petitioners appearing through videoconferencing seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh after rectifying some technical defect. 3. As requested, the petition and the accompanying application are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought. But it is made clear that liberty to file afresh does not mean that the petition deserves to be allowed despite such serious allegations in the FIR including the multiple stabbing incident. GIRISH KATHPALIA, J JULY 15, 2026/dr This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/07/2026 at 12:07:42

$~88 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2036/2026 & CRL.M.A. 20361/2026 SURAJ KUMAR AND OTHERS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Prakhar Gupta, Advocate (through videoconferencing). versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC for State (through videoconferencing). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R % 15.07.2026 1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 121/2025 of PS Karawal Nagar for offence under Section 69 BNS on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for petitioners appearing through videoconferencing seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh after rectifying some technical defect. 3. As requested, the petition and the accompanying application are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought. But it is made clear that liberty to file afresh does not mean that the petition deserves to be allowed despite such serious allegations in the FIR including the multiple stabbing incident. GIRISH KATHPALIA, J JULY 15, 2026/dr This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/07/2026 at 12:07:42