$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 1316/2026 CM APPL-39293/2026 CM APPL-39294/2026 MS. SHIVANGI SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V. K. Mantoo, Mr. Om Singh and Ms Niharika Mantoo, Advs. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shivam Sachdeva, Additional Standing Counsel, Mr. Sparsh Ruhela and Mr. Amit Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR O R D E R % 25.06.2026 1. Issue notice. 2. Mr. Shivam Sachdeva, learned Additional Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondent. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 10.06.2026, whereby learned Appellate Tribunal Municipal Corporation Of Delhi (ATMCD) had declined to grant adjournment sought by the petitioner herein on the ground that the petitioner (appellant before ATMCD) is seeking adjournment on one or another ground and is misusing the benefit of interim protection. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that son of the main This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/06/2026 at 12:16:46 counsel was hospitalized and that is the reason that the adjournment was being sought. However, learned counsel for petitioner submits that he has recently been engaged by the petitioner and now he undertakes to appear and participate in proceedings before ATMCD on each and every date. 5. I have considered the submissions. Though, I am not satisfied with the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner but still in the interest of justice, I grant one more opportunity to the petitioner to appear and participate in the proceedings before ATMCD. It is undertaken by learned counsel for petitioner that he will not seek any adjournment henceforth. 6. Consequently in view of this undertaking the impugned order vide which interim protection was vacated and MCD was directed to take action as per law is hereby set aside and the interim protection is continued till next date of hearing before ATMCD. 7. It is made clear that if petitioner-appellant before the ATMCD indulges in any further dilatory tactics, the ATMCD would be fully within its rights to vacate the interim protection. 8. Petition is disposed of along with pending applications. VINOD KUMAR, J (VACATION JUDGE) JUNE 25, 2026/dd This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/06/2026 at 12:16:46

$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 1316/2026 CM APPL-39293/2026 CM APPL-39294/2026 MS. SHIVANGI SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V. K. Mantoo, Mr. Om Singh and Ms Niharika Mantoo, Advs. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shivam Sachdeva, Additional Standing Counsel, Mr. Sparsh Ruhela and Mr. Amit Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR O R D E R % 25.06.2026 1. Issue notice. 2. Mr. Shivam Sachdeva, learned Additional Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondent. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 10.06.2026, whereby learned Appellate Tribunal Municipal Corporation Of Delhi (ATMCD) had declined to grant adjournment sought by the petitioner herein on the ground that the petitioner (appellant before ATMCD) is seeking adjournment on one or another ground and is misusing the benefit of interim protection. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that son of the main This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/06/2026 at 12:16:46 counsel was hospitalized and that is the reason that the adjournment was being sought. However, learned counsel for petitioner submits that he has recently been engaged by the petitioner and now he undertakes to appear and participate in proceedings before ATMCD on each and every date. 5. I have considered the submissions. Though, I am not satisfied with the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner but still in the interest of justice, I grant one more opportunity to the petitioner to appear and participate in the proceedings before ATMCD. It is undertaken by learned counsel for petitioner that he will not seek any adjournment henceforth. 6. Consequently in view of this undertaking the impugned order vide which interim protection was vacated and MCD was directed to take action as per law is hereby set aside and the interim protection is continued till next date of hearing before ATMCD. 7. It is made clear that if petitioner-appellant before the ATMCD indulges in any further dilatory tactics, the ATMCD would be fully within its rights to vacate the interim protection. 8. Petition is disposed of along with pending applications. VINOD KUMAR, J (VACATION JUDGE) JUNE 25, 2026/dd This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/06/2026 at 12:16:46