1 CGHC010310342026 2026:CGHC:39814 Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2026.09.1114:07:03 NAFR +0530 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 7489 of 2026  Dhaneshwar Dhanwar S/o Sibo Dhanwar Aged About 45 Years R/o Lamdad, Nawamuda P.S. Lailunga, Distt. Raigarh Chhattisgarh ... Applicant versus  State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer (S H O) P.S. Lailunga, Distt. Raigarh Chhattisgarh ... Non-applicant For Applicant : Mr. Ashutosh Biswas, Advocate For Non-Applicant : Mr. Himanshu Yadu, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 11.09.2026 1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 234/2026 registered at Police Station Lailunga, District Raigarh (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Sections 34(2) and 59(a) of the C.G. Excise Act against the present applicant. 2 2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that police of Police Station Lailunga, District Raigarh (C.G.), has received a secret information from the informant and on the basis of said information, raid was conducted and seized 40 liters of mahua liquor from the possession of the present applicant. Thereafter, the aforesaid case was registered against the present applicant.

3. Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the present applicant is a daily wage laborer and he has been falsely implicated in this case and the said 40 liters of mahua liquor was not seized from the exclusive possession of the applicant. It is further argued by him that the present applicant has no criminal antecedents under the Excise Act and under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act, minimum punishment is one year and maximum punishment is three years and the present applicant has been in jail since 21.07.2026, conclusion of the trial is likely to take quite long time. Therefore, he prays for grant of regular bail to the applicant. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State, opposes the bail application and submit that the charge-sheet has been filed in the present case before the competent Court. He also submits that the applicant may abscond, therefore he is not entitled for grant of regular bail in the present case. 5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary. 3

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the present applicant and the fact that the present applicant has no criminal antecedent under the Excise Act pending against him, moreover, the fact that the charge-sheet has been filed before the competent Court and he is in jail since 21.07.2026, conclusion of the trial may take some more time, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case. 7. Let the applicant – Dhaneshwar Dhanwar involved in Crime No. 234/2026 registered at Police Station Lailunga, District Raigarh (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Sections 34(2) and 59(a) of the C.G. Excise Act, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against his under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on 4 the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against his, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. - Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE A j i n k y a

1 CGHC010310342026 2026:CGHC:39814 Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2026.09.1114:07:03 NAFR +0530 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 7489 of 2026  Dhaneshwar Dhanwar S/o Sibo Dhanwar Aged About 45 Years R/o Lamdad, Nawamuda P.S. Lailunga, Distt. Raigarh Chhattisgarh ... Applicant versus  State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer (S H O) P.S. Lailunga, Distt. Raigarh Chhattisgarh ... Non-applicant For Applicant : Mr. Ashutosh Biswas, Advocate For Non-Applicant : Mr. Himanshu Yadu, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 11.09.2026 1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 234/2026 registered at Police Station Lailunga, District Raigarh (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Sections 34(2) and 59(a) of the C.G. Excise Act against the present applicant. 2 2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that police of Police Station Lailunga, District Raigarh (C.G.), has received a secret information from the informant and on the basis of said information, raid was conducted and seized 40 liters of mahua liquor from the possession of the present applicant. Thereafter, the aforesaid case was registered against the present applicant.

3. Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the present applicant is a daily wage laborer and he has been falsely implicated in this case and the said 40 liters of mahua liquor was not seized from the exclusive possession of the applicant. It is further argued by him that the present applicant has no criminal antecedents under the Excise Act and under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act, minimum punishment is one year and maximum punishment is three years and the present applicant has been in jail since 21.07.2026, conclusion of the trial is likely to take quite long time. Therefore, he prays for grant of regular bail to the applicant. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State, opposes the bail application and submit that the charge-sheet has been filed in the present case before the competent Court. He also submits that the applicant may abscond, therefore he is not entitled for grant of regular bail in the present case. 5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary. 3

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the present applicant and the fact that the present applicant has no criminal antecedent under the Excise Act pending against him, moreover, the fact that the charge-sheet has been filed before the competent Court and he is in jail since 21.07.2026, conclusion of the trial may take some more time, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case. 7. Let the applicant – Dhaneshwar Dhanwar involved in Crime No. 234/2026 registered at Police Station Lailunga, District Raigarh (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Sections 34(2) and 59(a) of the C.G. Excise Act, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against his under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on 4 the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against his, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. - Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE A j i n k y a