1 CGHC010522442025 2026:CGHC:39699 KUNAL DEWANGAN NAFR Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 10115 of 2025 Smt. Varsha Khunte W/o Late Sahil Patle Aged About 20 Years R/o Village Mohanpur, P.S. Baloda, District Janjgir-Champa (Chhattisgarh) At Present R/o Kalikanagar, Tifra, P.S. Sirgitti, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) (The P.S. Name Of Janjgir-Champa Is Wrongly Mentioned In Impugned Order In The Cause Title Of Applicant No. 1) (The Husband Name Of Applicant No. 2 Is Wrongly Mentioned As Sahil Khunte) ... Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Chakarbhatha, Distt.- Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ...Non-applicant(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate. For Non-applicant(s) : Ms. Supriya Upasane, Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey, Judge Order on Board 10.09.2026 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present bail application has become infructuous. 2 3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the applicant, the present bail application is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Kunal

1 CGHC010522442025 2026:CGHC:39699 KUNAL DEWANGAN NAFR Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 10115 of 2025 Smt. Varsha Khunte W/o Late Sahil Patle Aged About 20 Years R/o Village Mohanpur, P.S. Baloda, District Janjgir-Champa (Chhattisgarh) At Present R/o Kalikanagar, Tifra, P.S. Sirgitti, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) (The P.S. Name Of Janjgir-Champa Is Wrongly Mentioned In Impugned Order In The Cause Title Of Applicant No. 1) (The Husband Name Of Applicant No. 2 Is Wrongly Mentioned As Sahil Khunte) ... Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Chakarbhatha, Distt.- Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ...Non-applicant(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate. For Non-applicant(s) : Ms. Supriya Upasane, Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey, Judge Order on Board 10.09.2026 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present bail application has become infructuous. 2 3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the applicant, the present bail application is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Kunal