1 CGHC010349232026 2026:CGHC:39410 by SINGHsigned cn=REKHA SINGH, COURT,REKHA COURT OF DigitallyREKHADN:ou=HIGHo=HIGHCHHATTISGARH,st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN NAFRSINGH 2026.09.09 Date:14:34:09 +0530 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 853 of 2026 1 - The Principal, D.D.M. Public Higher Secondary School Namely Ashok Kumar Dogra, ( A. P. Singh Aged About 54 Years, Is Not Presently Working As Principal Of The School D D M Road, Korba District Korba, C. G. ) The Address Of Earlier Principal Is Given In The Impugned Order Sheet I.E. R/o M I G -2 / 29, Nigam Colony M P. Nagar Post And District Korba, C. G. S/o Dharam Singh Dogra, Aged About 51 Years Haibowl Kalan, Ludhiana, Punjab, 141001, Present Address. D. D. M. Public Higher Secondary, School D.D. M. Road, Korba District Korba, C. G. ... Applicant versus 1 - Anand Kishore Singh S/o Late Akhilanand Singh Aged About 51 Years R/o Near Lovely Care School Durpa, Road, Purani, Basti, Post And District Korba C. G. ---- Respondents For Applicant : Mr. Harshmandar Rastogi, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 09.09.2026 1) Heard. 2) The applicant has preferred this MCC application for restoration of WPL No.10 of 2025 which was dismissed on account of peremptory order dated 23.06.2026. On said date, counsel appearing for the applicant was granted one week’s time to comply with the order dated -2-

30.04.2026. It was also observed in the order that if the applicant fails to rectify the defects within a period of one week, WPL No.10 of 2025 shall be dismissed without further reference to the Bench. It appears that the applicant failed to rectify the defects, resultantly, WPL No.10 of 2025 got dismissed. 3) Mr. Rastogi, Advocate would submit that due to inadvertence, the applicant could not rectify the defects pointed out by the Registry and on account of peremptory order dated 23.06.2026, WPL No.10 of 2025 got dismissed. He would submit that the applicant is highly interested in pursuing the matter and the mistake was bonafide. He would pray to allow this application. 4) Heard. 5) Taking into consideration the submission made by Mr. Rastogi and the grounds raised in the application, the same is allowed and WPL No.10 of 2025 is restored to its original number subject to payment of cost of Rs.5,000/- payable to the High Court Legal Aid Committee. 6) MCC stands disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha

1 CGHC010349232026 2026:CGHC:39410 by SINGHsigned cn=REKHA SINGH, COURT,REKHA COURT OF DigitallyREKHADN:ou=HIGHo=HIGHCHHATTISGARH,st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN NAFRSINGH 2026.09.09 Date:14:34:09 +0530 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 853 of 2026 1 - The Principal, D.D.M. Public Higher Secondary School Namely Ashok Kumar Dogra, ( A. P. Singh Aged About 54 Years, Is Not Presently Working As Principal Of The School D D M Road, Korba District Korba, C. G. ) The Address Of Earlier Principal Is Given In The Impugned Order Sheet I.E. R/o M I G -2 / 29, Nigam Colony M P. Nagar Post And District Korba, C. G. S/o Dharam Singh Dogra, Aged About 51 Years Haibowl Kalan, Ludhiana, Punjab, 141001, Present Address. D. D. M. Public Higher Secondary, School D.D. M. Road, Korba District Korba, C. G. ... Applicant versus 1 - Anand Kishore Singh S/o Late Akhilanand Singh Aged About 51 Years R/o Near Lovely Care School Durpa, Road, Purani, Basti, Post And District Korba C. G. ---- Respondents For Applicant : Mr. Harshmandar Rastogi, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 09.09.2026 1) Heard. 2) The applicant has preferred this MCC application for restoration of WPL No.10 of 2025 which was dismissed on account of peremptory order dated 23.06.2026. On said date, counsel appearing for the applicant was granted one week’s time to comply with the order dated -2-

30.04.2026. It was also observed in the order that if the applicant fails to rectify the defects within a period of one week, WPL No.10 of 2025 shall be dismissed without further reference to the Bench. It appears that the applicant failed to rectify the defects, resultantly, WPL No.10 of 2025 got dismissed. 3) Mr. Rastogi, Advocate would submit that due to inadvertence, the applicant could not rectify the defects pointed out by the Registry and on account of peremptory order dated 23.06.2026, WPL No.10 of 2025 got dismissed. He would submit that the applicant is highly interested in pursuing the matter and the mistake was bonafide. He would pray to allow this application. 4) Heard. 5) Taking into consideration the submission made by Mr. Rastogi and the grounds raised in the application, the same is allowed and WPL No.10 of 2025 is restored to its original number subject to payment of cost of Rs.5,000/- payable to the High Court Legal Aid Committee. 6) MCC stands disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha