Chhattisgarh High Court
Uttara Kumar Nishad v. State of Chhattisgarh
2026:CGHC:38988-DB · WPPIL/151/2022
- Decision date
- 2026-09-02
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
1 CGHC010369672022 2026:CGHC:38988-DB NAFR Digitally signed by ALOK HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SHARMA ALOK Date: SHARMA 2026.09.03 18:48:44 +0530 WPPIL No. 151 of 2022 Uttara Kumar Nishad S/o Nandu Ram Nishad Aged About 51 Years R/o Village Jatri, Tahsil Pussore, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department,mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director Health Services, Indravati Bhawan, Nava Raipour Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Collector Raigarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Chief Medical And Health Officer Raigarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 5 - The Block Medical Officer Pussore Raigarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. C. R. Sahu, Advocate along with Mr. Bharat Lal Dembra, Advocate. For State : Mr. Prasun Bhaduri, Deputy Advocate General. 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 03/09/2026 1. Heard Mr. C. R. Sahu, along with Mr. Bharat Lal Dembra, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Prasun Bhaduri, learned Deputy Advocate General, appearing for the respondent-State.
2. The present writ petition, styled as a Public Interest Litigation, has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs: "10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ or direction, directing the respondent authorities to stop the construction of Primary Health Centre over play ground of School and shifted to some other suitable place as available in the village Jatri after following due procedure of law. 10.2. Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper looking to the facts and circumstances of the case may also be awarded to the petitioner including the cost and expenses of this petition. An affidavit in support of this petition is filed herewith." 3. Learned counsel appearing for the parties would submit that during the pendency of the present petition, the construction of the Primary Health Centre in question has already been completed and the same has also been inaugurated. In view of the subsequent 3 developments, the grievance raised by the petitioner in the present petition no longer survives and the present petition has become infructuous. 4. In view of the aforesaid submission and the subsequent developments, no further adjudication is required in the matter. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Alok