1 CGHC010243702020 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4866 of 2020 S. Kumar Dahariya S/o Late Sakhuram Dahariya Aged About 43 Years R/o Krishak Nagar Village Jora, Tahsil And District Raipur (Cg), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Digitally versus SAIFAN signed by KHAN SAIFAN KHAN 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Public Works Capital Complex, New Raipur, Raipur (Cg), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Chief Engineer Public Works Department, Near Kalimai Mandir Aakashwani Chowk, Raipur Dist. Raipur (Cg), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Executive Engineer Sub Division Survey, Public Works Department, Raipur, District Raipur (Cg), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Petitioner : Mr. Sudeep Johri, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Sharad Mishra, Panel Lawyer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board) 01.09.2026 1. Heard.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would make sole submission that for redressal of petitioner’s grievance, he may be permitted to file comprehensive representation before the respondent-authorities and same may be directed to be considered and decided within a reasonable time in light of circular dated 05.03.2008 (Annexure-P/05) 2 and decision of the Supreme Court in Dharam Singh and ors v. State of UP and another 1. 3. Be that as it may, the petitioner is permitted to file a comprehensive representation alongwith relevant documents and copy of this order within six weeks from today and, in turn, the concerned respondent-authority is directed to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner in light of circular dated 05.03.2008 (Annexure-P/05) and decision of the Supreme Court in the matter of Dharam Singh (supra) in accordance with law within a period of further 06 weeks from the date of receipt of said representation by passing reasoned and speaking order. 4. With aforesaid observation, direction and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge s@if 1 2025 AIR (SC) 3897

1 CGHC010243702020 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4866 of 2020 S. Kumar Dahariya S/o Late Sakhuram Dahariya Aged About 43 Years R/o Krishak Nagar Village Jora, Tahsil And District Raipur (Cg), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Digitally versus SAIFAN signed by KHAN SAIFAN KHAN 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Public Works Capital Complex, New Raipur, Raipur (Cg), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Chief Engineer Public Works Department, Near Kalimai Mandir Aakashwani Chowk, Raipur Dist. Raipur (Cg), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Executive Engineer Sub Division Survey, Public Works Department, Raipur, District Raipur (Cg), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Petitioner : Mr. Sudeep Johri, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Sharad Mishra, Panel Lawyer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board) 01.09.2026 1. Heard.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would make sole submission that for redressal of petitioner’s grievance, he may be permitted to file comprehensive representation before the respondent-authorities and same may be directed to be considered and decided within a reasonable time in light of circular dated 05.03.2008 (Annexure-P/05) 2 and decision of the Supreme Court in Dharam Singh and ors v. State of UP and another 1. 3. Be that as it may, the petitioner is permitted to file a comprehensive representation alongwith relevant documents and copy of this order within six weeks from today and, in turn, the concerned respondent-authority is directed to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner in light of circular dated 05.03.2008 (Annexure-P/05) and decision of the Supreme Court in the matter of Dharam Singh (supra) in accordance with law within a period of further 06 weeks from the date of receipt of said representation by passing reasoned and speaking order. 4. With aforesaid observation, direction and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge s@if 1 2025 AIR (SC) 3897