1 CGHC010318072026 2026:CGHC:37021-DB Digitally NAFR signed by ALOK ALOKSHARMA SHARMA Date:2026.08.21 10:53:07 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR +0530 WPCR No. 481 of 2026 1 - Mukesh Bansal S/o Sagarmal Bansal Aged About 40 Years R/o House No. 1165, Gurushree Villa, Ward No. 04, Near Mahindra Showroom, Dhimrapur Chowk, Raigarh, Tahsil And Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Nanak Bansal S/o Sagarmal Bansal Aged About 51 Years R/o House No. 1165, Gurushree Villa, Ward No. 04, Near Mahindra Showroom, Dhimrapur Chowk, Raigarh, Tahsil And Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Home, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The District Magistrate Revenue District Sakti, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Superintendent Of Police Revenue District Sakti, Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Station House Officer Police Station Baradwar, Revenue District Sakti, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Nimesh Pratap Singh S/o Jaiprakash Singh, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Of Shiv Vihar Colony, K.K. Ward Bhatapara, Tahsil Bhatapara, Distt. Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Rajiv Lochan Shukla S/o Ramesh Shukla Aged About 56 Years R/o Ward No. 19, Kamal Colony, Baloda Bazar, Distt. Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. 2

7 - Kamal Narayan Sahu S/o Devmani Sahu Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Kumhi, Fingeshwar, Distt. Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh. 8 - Rajendra Kumar Agrawal S/o Bisaahu Lal Agrawal Aged About 61 Years R/o Parshuram Ward, Bhatapara, Distt. Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. 9 - Abhishek Prememndra Das S/o Ajendra Kumar Das Aged About 46 Years R/o Ward No. 19, Kamal Colony, Balodabazar, Distt. Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. .. Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hari Agrawal, Advocate. For State : Mr. Priyank Rathi, Govt. Advocate. For Respondent No. 5 : Mr. Pushp Kumar Gupta, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 19/08/2026 Heard Mr. Hari Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Priyank Rathi, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the respondents-State and Mr. Pushp Kumar Gupta, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 5. 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs: “i. A writ and / or an order in the nature of appropriate writ do issue quashing the FIR No. 190/2025 dated 18.07.2025 (Annexure P-1) registered against the Petitioners, for offence punishable under Section 420, 3 34 of IPC, 1860 at Police Station- Baradwar, Revenue District, Sakti (C.G.), in the interest of justice.

ii. Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts & circumstances of case.” 3. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents-State, on instructions, submits that the investigation in the matter has been completed and the Closure Report has been prepared. He further submits that the Closure Report shall be filed before the concerned Court today. 4. In view of the aforesaid submission made by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents-State, nothing further survives for consideration in the present petition at this stage. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to law, if occasion so arises. 5. The Registry is directed to return the certified copies of the annexure to learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining attested true copies of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Alok

1 CGHC010318072026 2026:CGHC:37021-DB Digitally NAFR signed by ALOK ALOKSHARMA SHARMA Date:2026.08.21 10:53:07 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR +0530 WPCR No. 481 of 2026 1 - Mukesh Bansal S/o Sagarmal Bansal Aged About 40 Years R/o House No. 1165, Gurushree Villa, Ward No. 04, Near Mahindra Showroom, Dhimrapur Chowk, Raigarh, Tahsil And Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Nanak Bansal S/o Sagarmal Bansal Aged About 51 Years R/o House No. 1165, Gurushree Villa, Ward No. 04, Near Mahindra Showroom, Dhimrapur Chowk, Raigarh, Tahsil And Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Home, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The District Magistrate Revenue District Sakti, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Superintendent Of Police Revenue District Sakti, Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Station House Officer Police Station Baradwar, Revenue District Sakti, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Nimesh Pratap Singh S/o Jaiprakash Singh, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Of Shiv Vihar Colony, K.K. Ward Bhatapara, Tahsil Bhatapara, Distt. Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Rajiv Lochan Shukla S/o Ramesh Shukla Aged About 56 Years R/o Ward No. 19, Kamal Colony, Baloda Bazar, Distt. Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. 2

7 - Kamal Narayan Sahu S/o Devmani Sahu Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Kumhi, Fingeshwar, Distt. Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh. 8 - Rajendra Kumar Agrawal S/o Bisaahu Lal Agrawal Aged About 61 Years R/o Parshuram Ward, Bhatapara, Distt. Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. 9 - Abhishek Prememndra Das S/o Ajendra Kumar Das Aged About 46 Years R/o Ward No. 19, Kamal Colony, Balodabazar, Distt. Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. .. Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hari Agrawal, Advocate. For State : Mr. Priyank Rathi, Govt. Advocate. For Respondent No. 5 : Mr. Pushp Kumar Gupta, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 19/08/2026 Heard Mr. Hari Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Priyank Rathi, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the respondents-State and Mr. Pushp Kumar Gupta, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 5. 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs: “i. A writ and / or an order in the nature of appropriate writ do issue quashing the FIR No. 190/2025 dated 18.07.2025 (Annexure P-1) registered against the Petitioners, for offence punishable under Section 420, 3 34 of IPC, 1860 at Police Station- Baradwar, Revenue District, Sakti (C.G.), in the interest of justice.

ii. Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts & circumstances of case.” 3. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents-State, on instructions, submits that the investigation in the matter has been completed and the Closure Report has been prepared. He further submits that the Closure Report shall be filed before the concerned Court today. 4. In view of the aforesaid submission made by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents-State, nothing further survives for consideration in the present petition at this stage. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to law, if occasion so arises. 5. The Registry is directed to return the certified copies of the annexure to learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining attested true copies of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Alok