1 CGHC010023152020 2026:CGHC:30725 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 234 of 2020 Indian Electrical, Through Proprietor Mohan Lal Khanduja, Aged About 69 Years, Son Of Late Chandumal, R/o Ganj Dawari, Station Road, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant versus 1 - Rishi Kumar Patel ,Aged About 57 Years, S/o Late Monu Babu Patel, M/s Patel Agro Clinic And Business Centre, Post Kapsi, District Kanker Chhattisgarh. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Non-applicants For Applicant : None. For Non-applicant No.1 : Shri C.R. Sahu, Advocate. For Non-applicant No.2/State : Shri Kanhaiya Ram Yadav, Panel Lawyer. Digitally signed NARESH byKUMARNARESHKUMAR KAMDE SB: Hon'ble Shri Justic e Sanjay S. Agrawal KAMDE Date:2026.07.20 16:56:01 +0530 Order on Board 20/07/2026 1. No one appeared nor any representation is made on behalf of the applicant though the matter has been called twice. 2. In the above circumstances, this Court is left with no other option, but to dismiss this revision for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this revision is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) JUDGE Kamde

1 CGHC010023152020 2026:CGHC:30725 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 234 of 2020 Indian Electrical, Through Proprietor Mohan Lal Khanduja, Aged About 69 Years, Son Of Late Chandumal, R/o Ganj Dawari, Station Road, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant versus 1 - Rishi Kumar Patel ,Aged About 57 Years, S/o Late Monu Babu Patel, M/s Patel Agro Clinic And Business Centre, Post Kapsi, District Kanker Chhattisgarh. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Non-applicants For Applicant : None. For Non-applicant No.1 : Shri C.R. Sahu, Advocate. For Non-applicant No.2/State : Shri Kanhaiya Ram Yadav, Panel Lawyer. Digitally signed NARESH byKUMARNARESHKUMAR KAMDE SB: Hon'ble Shri Justic e Sanjay S. Agrawal KAMDE Date:2026.07.20 16:56:01 +0530 Order on Board 20/07/2026 1. No one appeared nor any representation is made on behalf of the applicant though the matter has been called twice. 2. In the above circumstances, this Court is left with no other option, but to dismiss this revision for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this revision is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) JUDGE Kamde