Chhattisgarh High Court
Pushpa Haldar v. State of Chhattisgarh
2026:CGHC:29499 · WP227/824/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-07-12
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
1 CGHC010251622026 2026:CGHC:29499 Digitally NAFR SUMIT signedby KUMAR SUMIT KUMAR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 824 of 2026 Pushpa Haldar D/o Jogendra Haldar Aged About 71 Years Cast-Namoshudra, R/o- Village Silfili, Tehsil Latori, District- Surajpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Surajpur, Office At Collectorate Composite Building, Surajpur, District Surajpur (C.G.) 2 - Sushil Kumar Agrawal S/o Late Ramkrishna R/o Aazad Ward, Banaras Road, Patelpara, Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 3 - Shanti Vishwas W/o Late Manedra Nath Vishwas Aged About 57 Years Residing At Village Silfili, Tehsil Latori, District- Surajpur (C.G.) 4 - Kamal Adhikari S/o Bhadreshwar Adhikari Aged About 66 Years Residing At Village Silfili, Tehsil Latori, District- Surajpur (C.G.) 5 - Pawan Kumar Agrawal S/o Late Ghansiram Agrawal R/o- Deviganj Road, Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Neeraj Choubey, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Ashutosh Trivedi, Panel Lawyer for the State (Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.) Order on Board 13/07/2026 2
1. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach before the Board of Revenue and raise objection afresh and in such eventuality, the Board of Revenue may be directed to decide the same in accordance with law, on its own merits. 2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, however, the Board of Revenue is directed that in the eventuality of filing the objection by the petitioner, it should be decided in accordance with law, on its own merits after providing opportunity of hearing to the parties. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE Sumit