1 2026:CGHC:26507 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPL No. 43 of 2026 • Jaiprakash Shrivastava S/o Late Shri Harihar Lal Shrivastava Aged About 59 Years R/o B/4, New Rajnagar Colony, Post Rajgar Colliery Anuppur (M.P.) ... Petitioner Digitally signed by SIDDHANT SIDDHANT TAMRAKARTAMRAKAR Date: versus 2026.06.30 14:56:54 +0530 1. Rashtriya Koyla Kamgar Sangh (Intuc) Through General Secretary, P.K. Rai, S/o Late Shri Rajmangal Rai Aged About 72 Years R/o North Jhagrakhand, Ward No. 15, District- Manendragarh- Chirmiri, Baikunthpur (C.G.) 2. Registrar, Trade Union Chhattisgarh Block- 3, Second Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Shri S.S. Paikara, Registrar, Trade Union , Chhattisgarh Block- 3 Second Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Dinesh Bole, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. S.P. Kale, Advocate For State/Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Dy. Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 30.06.2026 1. Heard on I.A. No. 3/2026, an application for permission for withdrawal of petition with liberty to challenge the subsequent final order. 2. Mr. S. P. Kale, Advocate appearing for respondent No. 2 would oppose such prayer. He would submit that final order has already been passed, and therefore, no such liberty can be granted. It is also contended that petitioner was not party before the learned Court below.

3. Mr. Vinay Pandey would endorse the submission made by Mr. Kale. 2 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. This writ petition was filed by the petitioner assailing order dated 10.02.2026 passed by Industrial Court, Bilaspur. During the pendency of this petition, final order has been passed on 16.06.2026, and therefore, an application has been moved for withdrawal of writ petition. The prayer made by the petitioner appears to be fair, accordingly, allowed. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. With regard to liberty, as final order has already been passed during the pendency of this petition, the liberty is granted as payed for. However, the respondent No. 1 shall be at liberty to take objection before the appropriate forum with regard to locus of the petitioner and maintainability of appeal etc. 7. Accordingly, I.A. No. 3/2026 is disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE $iddhant

1 2026:CGHC:26507 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPL No. 43 of 2026 • Jaiprakash Shrivastava S/o Late Shri Harihar Lal Shrivastava Aged About 59 Years R/o B/4, New Rajnagar Colony, Post Rajgar Colliery Anuppur (M.P.) ... Petitioner Digitally signed by SIDDHANT SIDDHANT TAMRAKARTAMRAKAR Date: versus 2026.06.30 14:56:54 +0530 1. Rashtriya Koyla Kamgar Sangh (Intuc) Through General Secretary, P.K. Rai, S/o Late Shri Rajmangal Rai Aged About 72 Years R/o North Jhagrakhand, Ward No. 15, District- Manendragarh- Chirmiri, Baikunthpur (C.G.) 2. Registrar, Trade Union Chhattisgarh Block- 3, Second Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Shri S.S. Paikara, Registrar, Trade Union , Chhattisgarh Block- 3 Second Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Dinesh Bole, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. S.P. Kale, Advocate For State/Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Dy. Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 30.06.2026 1. Heard on I.A. No. 3/2026, an application for permission for withdrawal of petition with liberty to challenge the subsequent final order. 2. Mr. S. P. Kale, Advocate appearing for respondent No. 2 would oppose such prayer. He would submit that final order has already been passed, and therefore, no such liberty can be granted. It is also contended that petitioner was not party before the learned Court below.

3. Mr. Vinay Pandey would endorse the submission made by Mr. Kale. 2 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. This writ petition was filed by the petitioner assailing order dated 10.02.2026 passed by Industrial Court, Bilaspur. During the pendency of this petition, final order has been passed on 16.06.2026, and therefore, an application has been moved for withdrawal of writ petition. The prayer made by the petitioner appears to be fair, accordingly, allowed. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. With regard to liberty, as final order has already been passed during the pendency of this petition, the liberty is granted as payed for. However, the respondent No. 1 shall be at liberty to take objection before the appropriate forum with regard to locus of the petitioner and maintainability of appeal etc. 7. Accordingly, I.A. No. 3/2026 is disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE $iddhant