1 2026:CGHC:25445 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 396 of 2013 1 - Vishnu Prasad S/o Late Dwarika Prasad Aged About 70 Years R/o Madai, At Presently R/o Kawardha, Tah. And Distt. Kawardha C.G. 2 (A)- Ramabai D/o Late Dwarika Prasad Aged About 65 Years (Dead), Thru- Legal Heirs (I) Pramod Kumar S/o Late Sitaram Aged About 30 Years R/o Raipur, Distt. Raipur C.G., (II) Padameshwar @ Lallu Prasad S/o Late Sitaram Aged About 26 Years R/o Raipur, Distt. Raipur C.G., (III) Kavya Kumari D/o Late Sitaram Aged About 26 Years R/o Raipur, Distt. Raipur C.G., 2 A.Bhagirathi S/o Late Sukhnandan Aged About 55 Years R/o Madai, Tah. Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur C.G., B. - Salikram S/o Late Sukhnandan Aged About 51 Years R/o Madai, Tah. Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur C.G. C.- Dhruv Kumar S/o Late Sukhnandan Aged About 47 Years R/o Madai, Tah. Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur C.G. D- Prahlad S/o Late Sukhnandan Aged About 45 Years R/o Madai, Tah. Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur C.G. 2 E. - Santosh S/o Late Sukhnandan Aged About 39 Years R/o Madai, Tah. Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur C.G. G. - Smt. Shyama Bai D/o Late Sukhnandan Aged About 60 Years R/o Madai, Tah. Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur C.G. H. - Smt. Taramani W/o Basant Kumar Aged About 41 Years D/o Late Sukhnandan Prasad, R/o Madai, Tah. Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur C.G. I. - Santoshi D/o Late Sukhnandan Aged About 35 Years R/o Madai, Tah. Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur C.G.

3 - Jam Bai D/o Late Dwarika Prasad Dead, Wd/o Late Madho Prasad, Chhattisgarh 3 (A) - Smt. Godawari Bai W/o Shyamanand Agrawal Aged About 60 Years R/o Sindhi Colony, Champa, Distt. Janjgir-Champa C.G., (B). - Smt. Gomati Bai W/o Dwarika Prasad Aged About 42 Years R/o Jok Madi, Sakra, Distt. Mahasamund C.G., (C). - Smt. Malti Wd/o Khamchand Agrawal R/o Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir-Champa Chhattisgarh (D). - Smt. Taluni Bai W/o Satyaprakash Agrawal Aged About 32 Years R/o Purani Basti, Raipur C.G., (E) - Ramkishore S/o Late Madho Prasad Agrawal Aged About 44 Years R/o Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir-Champa C.G. ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Ratnesh Agrawal S/o Shivshankar Agrawal Aged About 30 Years R/o Madai, At Present R/o Juna Bilaspur, Near Shanti Lodge, Tah. And Distt. Bilaspur C.G. 2- State Of Chhattisgarh Thru- Collector, Bilaspur C.G. Digitally signed by DEEPTI DEEPTI HARIKUMAR HARIKUMAR Date: 2026.06.25 10:39:57 +0530 3 3 - General Manager, N.T.P.C. Seepat, Tah. Masturi, Sub Tahsil- Seepat, Distt. Bilaspur C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Appellant (s) : None For Respondent No.1 : Shri Saurav Agrawal, Adv. on behalf of Ms. Prabha Sharma, Advocate For State : Shri Jaiprakash Tiwari, Panel Lawyer ({Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput}) Order on Board 22/06/2026 On 06/11/2023, 03/01/2024, 11/01/2024, 21/03/2025 and on 08/05/2026, none appeared on behalf of the appellants.

This Court, on 08/05/2026, directed this matter to be listed in the next week observing that if no representation is made on the next date of hearing, this Court may pass appropriate orders. When the matter is called today, again none appeared on behalf of the appellants nor any representation is made. It appears that the appellants have lost interest in this case and thus the counsel are absent on many occasions when the case was called. In view of the above, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- ({Sachin Singh Rajput}) JUDGE Deepti

1 2026:CGHC:25445 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 396 of 2013 1 - Vishnu Prasad S/o Late Dwarika Prasad Aged About 70 Years R/o Madai, At Presently R/o Kawardha, Tah. And Distt. Kawardha C.G. 2 (A)- Ramabai D/o Late Dwarika Prasad Aged About 65 Years (Dead), Thru- Legal Heirs (I) Pramod Kumar S/o Late Sitaram Aged About 30 Years R/o Raipur, Distt. Raipur C.G., (II) Padameshwar @ Lallu Prasad S/o Late Sitaram Aged About 26 Years R/o Raipur, Distt. Raipur C.G., (III) Kavya Kumari D/o Late Sitaram Aged About 26 Years R/o Raipur, Distt. Raipur C.G., 2 A.Bhagirathi S/o Late Sukhnandan Aged About 55 Years R/o Madai, Tah. Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur C.G., B. - Salikram S/o Late Sukhnandan Aged About 51 Years R/o Madai, Tah. Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur C.G. C.- Dhruv Kumar S/o Late Sukhnandan Aged About 47 Years R/o Madai, Tah. Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur C.G. D- Prahlad S/o Late Sukhnandan Aged About 45 Years R/o Madai, Tah. Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur C.G. 2 E. - Santosh S/o Late Sukhnandan Aged About 39 Years R/o Madai, Tah. Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur C.G. G. - Smt. Shyama Bai D/o Late Sukhnandan Aged About 60 Years R/o Madai, Tah. Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur C.G. H. - Smt. Taramani W/o Basant Kumar Aged About 41 Years D/o Late Sukhnandan Prasad, R/o Madai, Tah. Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur C.G. I. - Santoshi D/o Late Sukhnandan Aged About 35 Years R/o Madai, Tah. Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur C.G.

3 - Jam Bai D/o Late Dwarika Prasad Dead, Wd/o Late Madho Prasad, Chhattisgarh 3 (A) - Smt. Godawari Bai W/o Shyamanand Agrawal Aged About 60 Years R/o Sindhi Colony, Champa, Distt. Janjgir-Champa C.G., (B). - Smt. Gomati Bai W/o Dwarika Prasad Aged About 42 Years R/o Jok Madi, Sakra, Distt. Mahasamund C.G., (C). - Smt. Malti Wd/o Khamchand Agrawal R/o Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir-Champa Chhattisgarh (D). - Smt. Taluni Bai W/o Satyaprakash Agrawal Aged About 32 Years R/o Purani Basti, Raipur C.G., (E) - Ramkishore S/o Late Madho Prasad Agrawal Aged About 44 Years R/o Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir-Champa C.G. ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Ratnesh Agrawal S/o Shivshankar Agrawal Aged About 30 Years R/o Madai, At Present R/o Juna Bilaspur, Near Shanti Lodge, Tah. And Distt. Bilaspur C.G. 2- State Of Chhattisgarh Thru- Collector, Bilaspur C.G. Digitally signed by DEEPTI DEEPTI HARIKUMAR HARIKUMAR Date: 2026.06.25 10:39:57 +0530 3 3 - General Manager, N.T.P.C. Seepat, Tah. Masturi, Sub Tahsil- Seepat, Distt. Bilaspur C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Appellant (s) : None For Respondent No.1 : Shri Saurav Agrawal, Adv. on behalf of Ms. Prabha Sharma, Advocate For State : Shri Jaiprakash Tiwari, Panel Lawyer ({Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput}) Order on Board 22/06/2026 On 06/11/2023, 03/01/2024, 11/01/2024, 21/03/2025 and on 08/05/2026, none appeared on behalf of the appellants.

This Court, on 08/05/2026, directed this matter to be listed in the next week observing that if no representation is made on the next date of hearing, this Court may pass appropriate orders. When the matter is called today, again none appeared on behalf of the appellants nor any representation is made. It appears that the appellants have lost interest in this case and thus the counsel are absent on many occasions when the case was called. In view of the above, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- ({Sachin Singh Rajput}) JUDGE Deepti