1 D/L 12 17.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (A) 2956 of 2026 Milan Biswas Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 arising out of Sonarpur Police Station Case No. 118 of 2020 dated 06.02.2020 under Sections 302/195A/120B of the IPC. And In the matter of : Milan Biswas ……Petitioner. Mr. Kunal Ganguly Mr. Sandip Dinda …for the Petitioner Mr. Pinaki Bhattacharyya, Sr. Gov. Adv Mr. Amartya Mohan Bhattacharya …for the State 1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was unaware regarding a criminal case pending against him. 2. Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 3. I find that this is a case under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and the case was registered in the year 2020. Charge-sheet was submitted in the year 2021. 4. Having regard to the gravity of the offence and the petitioner’s conduct of evading the process of law, I am not inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2 5. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner in CRM (A) 2956 of 2026 is dismissed. 6. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court.

7. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

1 D/L 12 17.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (A) 2956 of 2026 Milan Biswas Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 arising out of Sonarpur Police Station Case No. 118 of 2020 dated 06.02.2020 under Sections 302/195A/120B of the IPC. And In the matter of : Milan Biswas ……Petitioner. Mr. Kunal Ganguly Mr. Sandip Dinda …for the Petitioner Mr. Pinaki Bhattacharyya, Sr. Gov. Adv Mr. Amartya Mohan Bhattacharya …for the State 1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was unaware regarding a criminal case pending against him. 2. Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 3. I find that this is a case under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and the case was registered in the year 2020. Charge-sheet was submitted in the year 2021. 4. Having regard to the gravity of the offence and the petitioner’s conduct of evading the process of law, I am not inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2 5. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner in CRM (A) 2956 of 2026 is dismissed. 6. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court.

7. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)