1 D/L 13 16.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (M) 1899 of 2026 Sanjay Yadav @ Sanjoy Yadav Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/ Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with S.C. Case No. 667 of 2025 arising out of Rahara Police Station Case No. 187 of 2025 dated05.07.2025 under Sections 109/115(2)/117(2)/118(2)/3(5)/329(4)/351(2) of the BNS, 2023 and adding Section 103(1) of the BNS, 2023 And In the matter of : Sanjay Yadav @ Sanjoy Yadav ……Petitioner. Mr. Soumyajit Das Mahapatra Mr. Koustav Bagchi Mr. Priti Kar Bagchi Mr. Debayan Ghosh Ms. Madhurai Sinha Mr. Bisal Roy …for the Petitioner Mr. Aditya Tiwari Ms. Namrata Chatterjee …for the State 1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for one year and two months. The genesis of the dispute arose out of a property/land dispute. Charges have already been framed. 2. Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits number of persons were injured. The offending weapon was recovered at the instance of the 2 present petitioner and there is every possibility of the vulnerable witnesses being threatened.

3. I have considered the nature of the offence. The offence prima facie reflects dispute relating to land issues. The offending weapon was iron rod which was recovered at the instance of the petitioner. There are no criminal antecedents of the present petitioner. 4. Having considered the overall circumstances and the background of the purpose and dispute which escalated resulting in the offence being committed I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail on stringent conditions. 5. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. The petitioner, namely, Sanjay Yadav @ Sanjoy Yadav shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barrackpore. 6. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the district of North 24 Parganas without prior permission of the learned Trial Court. Additionally, petitioner shall stay outside the jurisdiction of Rahara Police Station and shall inform the address where he would be residing to the learned ACJM, Barrackpore before his release. There would be a condition imposed by the learned ACJM, Barrackpore to the extent that the petitioner would meet with 3

the Officer-in-Charge of the concerned police station where he would be residing once in every ten days till the vulnerable witnesses are over. The concerned police station will once in a month send a report regarding the compliance of the conditions to the learned ACJM, Barrackpore/ Trial Court. 7. With the aforesaid observation, C.R.M (M) 1899 of 2026 is allowed. 8. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court. 9. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

1 D/L 13 16.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (M) 1899 of 2026 Sanjay Yadav @ Sanjoy Yadav Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/ Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with S.C. Case No. 667 of 2025 arising out of Rahara Police Station Case No. 187 of 2025 dated05.07.2025 under Sections 109/115(2)/117(2)/118(2)/3(5)/329(4)/351(2) of the BNS, 2023 and adding Section 103(1) of the BNS, 2023 And In the matter of : Sanjay Yadav @ Sanjoy Yadav ……Petitioner. Mr. Soumyajit Das Mahapatra Mr. Koustav Bagchi Mr. Priti Kar Bagchi Mr. Debayan Ghosh Ms. Madhurai Sinha Mr. Bisal Roy …for the Petitioner Mr. Aditya Tiwari Ms. Namrata Chatterjee …for the State 1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for one year and two months. The genesis of the dispute arose out of a property/land dispute. Charges have already been framed. 2. Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits number of persons were injured. The offending weapon was recovered at the instance of the 2 present petitioner and there is every possibility of the vulnerable witnesses being threatened.

3. I have considered the nature of the offence. The offence prima facie reflects dispute relating to land issues. The offending weapon was iron rod which was recovered at the instance of the petitioner. There are no criminal antecedents of the present petitioner. 4. Having considered the overall circumstances and the background of the purpose and dispute which escalated resulting in the offence being committed I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail on stringent conditions. 5. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. The petitioner, namely, Sanjay Yadav @ Sanjoy Yadav shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barrackpore. 6. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the district of North 24 Parganas without prior permission of the learned Trial Court. Additionally, petitioner shall stay outside the jurisdiction of Rahara Police Station and shall inform the address where he would be residing to the learned ACJM, Barrackpore before his release. There would be a condition imposed by the learned ACJM, Barrackpore to the extent that the petitioner would meet with 3

the Officer-in-Charge of the concerned police station where he would be residing once in every ten days till the vulnerable witnesses are over. The concerned police station will once in a month send a report regarding the compliance of the conditions to the learned ACJM, Barrackpore/ Trial Court. 7. With the aforesaid observation, C.R.M (M) 1899 of 2026 is allowed. 8. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court. 9. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)