15.09.2026 M/L - 206 Court No.35 Rohan (Rejected) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M.(A) 2846 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Chittaranjan Police Station Case No. 03 of 2026 dated 11.03.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/109/3(5)/103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. -And- In the matter of: Shuvam Kumar Pandey …Petitioner Mr. Sarthak Choudhury Mr. Subhajit Chatterjee …for the Petitioner Mr. Rajendra Banerjee Mr. Somnath Bera …for the State 1. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been foisted with the present criminal case. 2. Learned advocate for the State submits that there are eye-witnesses who have narrated regarding the complicity of the present petitioner. 3. Having considered the materials available in the case diary, I am of the opinion that this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2 4. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. 5. With the aforesaid observation, C.R.M. (A) 2846 of 2026 is dismissed. 6. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. 7. All parties shall act in terms of the server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.

8. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

15.09.2026 M/L - 206 Court No.35 Rohan (Rejected) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M.(A) 2846 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Chittaranjan Police Station Case No. 03 of 2026 dated 11.03.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/109/3(5)/103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. -And- In the matter of: Shuvam Kumar Pandey …Petitioner Mr. Sarthak Choudhury Mr. Subhajit Chatterjee …for the Petitioner Mr. Rajendra Banerjee Mr. Somnath Bera …for the State 1. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been foisted with the present criminal case. 2. Learned advocate for the State submits that there are eye-witnesses who have narrated regarding the complicity of the present petitioner. 3. Having considered the materials available in the case diary, I am of the opinion that this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2 4. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. 5. With the aforesaid observation, C.R.M. (A) 2846 of 2026 is dismissed. 6. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. 7. All parties shall act in terms of the server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.

8. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)