03.09.2026 Serial no. 86 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (NDPS) 1914 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Kumarganj PS Case No. 94 of 2022 dated 21.03.2022 u/s 21(c)/22(c)/23(c)/29 of the NDPS Act. -And- In the matter of : Raju Sarkar … Petitioner(s) Mr. Anindya Ghosh Mr. Pronojit Roy … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Suman Agarwal Mr. Soumlya Dutta … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with the instant case only on the basis of statement of a co-accused. Learned advocate for the State submits that the case was registered in the year 2022 and the petitioner has been arrested after three and half years, i.e., on 20.09.2025. Learned advocate added that there has been recovery of 103 bottles of phensedyl from a motor cycle which belongs to the present petitioner. Having considered the fact that the petitioner was evading the process of law, I am of the opinion that it would not be fit and proper to release the petitioner on bail. 2 Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected. Accordingly, CRM (NDPS) 1914 of 2026 is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record.

Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

03.09.2026 Serial no. 86 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (NDPS) 1914 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Kumarganj PS Case No. 94 of 2022 dated 21.03.2022 u/s 21(c)/22(c)/23(c)/29 of the NDPS Act. -And- In the matter of : Raju Sarkar … Petitioner(s) Mr. Anindya Ghosh Mr. Pronojit Roy … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Suman Agarwal Mr. Soumlya Dutta … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with the instant case only on the basis of statement of a co-accused. Learned advocate for the State submits that the case was registered in the year 2022 and the petitioner has been arrested after three and half years, i.e., on 20.09.2025. Learned advocate added that there has been recovery of 103 bottles of phensedyl from a motor cycle which belongs to the present petitioner. Having considered the fact that the petitioner was evading the process of law, I am of the opinion that it would not be fit and proper to release the petitioner on bail. 2 Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected. Accordingly, CRM (NDPS) 1914 of 2026 is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record.

Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)