31.08.2026 Court No.35. D/L.72. Rakib (Allowed) CRM (A) 2826 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Ranaghat GRPS case no. 11 of 2026 dated 18.06.2026 under Sections 21(c) of the NDPS Act. And In the matter of : Rabindranath Biswas @ Rabi Jele. ……Petitioner. Mr. Prabir Majumder Mr. Snehansu Majumder Ms. Anindita Kundu ......for the Petitioner. Mr. L. Vishal Kumar Mr. Sanjib Das ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been implicated on the basis of the statement of co-accused. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail as 300 bottles of Eskuf cough syrup were recovered in the present case. On a specific query of this Court, State replies that the Case Diary or the police report do not reflect any previous antecedents or any CDR or money trail so far as the present case is concerned. In view of the aforesaid, prayer for anticipatory bail of the present petitioner namely, Rabindranath Biswas @ Rabi Jele is allowed. As such, in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer on such terms and 2 conditions as he deems fit and proper subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

As the investigation of the case is still in progress, the petitioner shall report to the Investigating Officer of the case within a period of ten days and thereafter, on all subsequent dates fixed by the Investigating Officer of the case for the sake of investigation till the report in final form is submitted before the jurisdictional Special Court. Accordingly, CRM (A) 2826 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

31.08.2026 Court No.35. D/L.72. Rakib (Allowed) CRM (A) 2826 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Ranaghat GRPS case no. 11 of 2026 dated 18.06.2026 under Sections 21(c) of the NDPS Act. And In the matter of : Rabindranath Biswas @ Rabi Jele. ……Petitioner. Mr. Prabir Majumder Mr. Snehansu Majumder Ms. Anindita Kundu ......for the Petitioner. Mr. L. Vishal Kumar Mr. Sanjib Das ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been implicated on the basis of the statement of co-accused. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail as 300 bottles of Eskuf cough syrup were recovered in the present case. On a specific query of this Court, State replies that the Case Diary or the police report do not reflect any previous antecedents or any CDR or money trail so far as the present case is concerned. In view of the aforesaid, prayer for anticipatory bail of the present petitioner namely, Rabindranath Biswas @ Rabi Jele is allowed. As such, in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer on such terms and 2 conditions as he deems fit and proper subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

As the investigation of the case is still in progress, the petitioner shall report to the Investigating Officer of the case within a period of ten days and thereafter, on all subsequent dates fixed by the Investigating Officer of the case for the sake of investigation till the report in final form is submitted before the jurisdictional Special Court. Accordingly, CRM (A) 2826 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)