33 31.08.2026 Ct. No. 05 adeb WPA 21152 of 2026 Narendra Nath Mondal Vs. The State of West Bengal & Anr. Mr. Mahadeb Sarkar Mr. Bivash Chowdhury …for the petitioner Mr. Rudraman Bhattacharyya Ms. Megha Datta …for the State 1. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of petitioner is taken on record. 2. By presenting this writ petition direction is prayed for upon concerned police authorities which will prevent respondent no. 8 from making construction encroaching land of petitioner. 3. State respondents are represented by learned advocate. 4. On perusal of complaint which is at page 37 of writ petition addressed to the concerned police authority it appears that petitioner is aggrieved by construction made by respondent no. 8 over plot of land. Police authority is not the appropriate authority to decide whether construction is being carried out by respondent no. 8 in accordance with law or not. If petitioner finds that respondent no. 8 is not 2 making construction as per plan sanctioned in that event petitioner shall be at liberty to approach appropriate forum/authority in pursuit of remedy. 5. However, concerned police authorities are directed to maintain peace and tranquility at the locale and to see that no untoward incident takes place. 6. Writ petition stands disposed of. 7. Parties to act on server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)

33 31.08.2026 Ct. No. 05 adeb WPA 21152 of 2026 Narendra Nath Mondal Vs. The State of West Bengal & Anr. Mr. Mahadeb Sarkar Mr. Bivash Chowdhury …for the petitioner Mr. Rudraman Bhattacharyya Ms. Megha Datta …for the State 1. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of petitioner is taken on record. 2. By presenting this writ petition direction is prayed for upon concerned police authorities which will prevent respondent no. 8 from making construction encroaching land of petitioner. 3. State respondents are represented by learned advocate. 4. On perusal of complaint which is at page 37 of writ petition addressed to the concerned police authority it appears that petitioner is aggrieved by construction made by respondent no. 8 over plot of land. Police authority is not the appropriate authority to decide whether construction is being carried out by respondent no. 8 in accordance with law or not. If petitioner finds that respondent no. 8 is not 2 making construction as per plan sanctioned in that event petitioner shall be at liberty to approach appropriate forum/authority in pursuit of remedy. 5. However, concerned police authorities are directed to maintain peace and tranquility at the locale and to see that no untoward incident takes place. 6. Writ petition stands disposed of. 7. Parties to act on server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)