27.08.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.7 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Not Pressed C.R.M. (A) 2900 of 2026 In Re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Beliaghata Police Station Case No. 168 of 2026 dated 06.07.2026 (G.R. Case No. 1837/2026). And In Re : Raju Naskar ... Petitioner. Mr. Uday Sankar Chattopadhyay, Ms. Trisha Rakshit, Ms. Rajashree Tah ... For the Petitioner. Ms. Roshni Singha Roy, Ms. Priyanka Bhattacharya ... For the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that he has received written instructions for not proceeding with the present application for anticipatory bail. Learned advocate for the State is present. In view of the prayer advanced on behalf of the petitioner, the application for anticipatory bail being CRM (A) 2900 of 2026 is dismissed as not pressed. Let the written instructions submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner be kept with the record. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

27.08.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.7 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Not Pressed C.R.M. (A) 2900 of 2026 In Re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Beliaghata Police Station Case No. 168 of 2026 dated 06.07.2026 (G.R. Case No. 1837/2026). And In Re : Raju Naskar ... Petitioner. Mr. Uday Sankar Chattopadhyay, Ms. Trisha Rakshit, Ms. Rajashree Tah ... For the Petitioner. Ms. Roshni Singha Roy, Ms. Priyanka Bhattacharya ... For the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that he has received written instructions for not proceeding with the present application for anticipatory bail. Learned advocate for the State is present. In view of the prayer advanced on behalf of the petitioner, the application for anticipatory bail being CRM (A) 2900 of 2026 is dismissed as not pressed. Let the written instructions submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner be kept with the record. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)