21.08.2026 In the High Court at Calcutta DL-5 Criminal Miscellaneous JurisdictionCourt No.551 [Bench ID-266058] Appellate Side (AD) (Dismissed as C.R.M. (A) 2442 of 2026 not maintainable) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kotwali Police Station Case No.409 of 2026 dated 08.07.2026 under Sections 316(2)/318(4)/351(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3(1)(r )/3(1)(s)/2(v)(a) of the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. G.R. No.59 2026 pending before the Ld. District 1st Additional Court, Paschim Medinipur. And In the matter of: Pathik Mallick ….petitioner Mr. Milon Mukherjee, Ld. Sr. Advocate Mr. Viraj Gupta, Advocate Mr. Ananda Gopal Mukherjee, Advocate …for the petitioner Mr. Brajesh Jha, Advocate Ms. Sreshtha Ghosh, Advocate Ms. Sanjana Jha, Advocate … for the State Mr. Sanjib Bandhopadhyay, Advocate Mr. Manoj Kumar Mondal, Advocate … for the de facto complainant 1. Memo of evidence filed in Court be taken on record. 2. It is submitted by the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case.

3. Having heard the submissions made on behalf of the learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner, learned Advocate appearing for the de facto complainant and the learned Advocate appearing for the State, it transpires that the instant case has also been initiated under Sections 3(1)(r)/3(1)(s)/2(v)(a) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 2 1989. 4. Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner, although, submits that the alleged incident of abusing the de facto complainant in the name of his caste has not been perpetrated in public viewing. 5. However, on perusal of the materials in the case diary, I find the things otherwise. 6. In such circumstances, in terms of provisions of Section 18 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, the instant application for anticipatory bail is not maintainable. 7. C.R.M. (A) 2442 of 2026 is dismissed as not maintainable. (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.) ABHIJIT Digitallyby ABHIJITsignedDAS DAS Date:17:18:222026.08.21+05'30'

21.08.2026 In the High Court at Calcutta DL-5 Criminal Miscellaneous JurisdictionCourt No.551 [Bench ID-266058] Appellate Side (AD) (Dismissed as C.R.M. (A) 2442 of 2026 not maintainable) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kotwali Police Station Case No.409 of 2026 dated 08.07.2026 under Sections 316(2)/318(4)/351(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3(1)(r )/3(1)(s)/2(v)(a) of the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. G.R. No.59 2026 pending before the Ld. District 1st Additional Court, Paschim Medinipur. And In the matter of: Pathik Mallick ….petitioner Mr. Milon Mukherjee, Ld. Sr. Advocate Mr. Viraj Gupta, Advocate Mr. Ananda Gopal Mukherjee, Advocate …for the petitioner Mr. Brajesh Jha, Advocate Ms. Sreshtha Ghosh, Advocate Ms. Sanjana Jha, Advocate … for the State Mr. Sanjib Bandhopadhyay, Advocate Mr. Manoj Kumar Mondal, Advocate … for the de facto complainant 1. Memo of evidence filed in Court be taken on record. 2. It is submitted by the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case.

3. Having heard the submissions made on behalf of the learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner, learned Advocate appearing for the de facto complainant and the learned Advocate appearing for the State, it transpires that the instant case has also been initiated under Sections 3(1)(r)/3(1)(s)/2(v)(a) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 2 1989. 4. Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner, although, submits that the alleged incident of abusing the de facto complainant in the name of his caste has not been perpetrated in public viewing. 5. However, on perusal of the materials in the case diary, I find the things otherwise. 6. In such circumstances, in terms of provisions of Section 18 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, the instant application for anticipatory bail is not maintainable. 7. C.R.M. (A) 2442 of 2026 is dismissed as not maintainable. (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.) ABHIJIT Digitallyby ABHIJITsignedDAS DAS Date:17:18:222026.08.21+05'30'