21.08.2026 Serial no.3 Aloke Ct. No. 30 CRR 4829 of 2023 Madhuri Roy & Anr. vs. The State of West Bengal & Anr. Ms. Jagriti Bhattacharya … for the petitioners Mr. Sachit Talukdar Mr. Subhendu Bandyopadhyay … for the opposite party no.2 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the revisional application has now become infructuous as the trial Court has passed the final judgment and the petitioners have been acquitted by the trial Court. 2. Accordingly, the revisonal application stands disposed of as ‘infructuous’. 3. Connected application, if any, stands disposed of. 4. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.)

21.08.2026 Serial no.3 Aloke Ct. No. 30 CRR 4829 of 2023 Madhuri Roy & Anr. vs. The State of West Bengal & Anr. Ms. Jagriti Bhattacharya … for the petitioners Mr. Sachit Talukdar Mr. Subhendu Bandyopadhyay … for the opposite party no.2 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the revisional application has now become infructuous as the trial Court has passed the final judgment and the petitioners have been acquitted by the trial Court. 2. Accordingly, the revisonal application stands disposed of as ‘infructuous’. 3. Connected application, if any, stands disposed of. 4. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.)