19.08.2026 Serial no. 42 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (M) 1026 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Kulti PS Case No. 630 of 2025 dated 06.11.2025 corresponding to GR No. 3070 of 2025 u/s 81/108/61(2) of the BNS. -And- In the matter of : Amit Thakur @ Barun Thakur … Petitioner(s) Ms. Minoti Gomes Mr. A. K. Dutta … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Anurag Sardar … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for about nine months and charge-sheet has already been submitted before the learned jurisdictional court. Learned advocate also submits that the background of the case relates to a relationship between the victim (deceased) and the present petitioner. Learned advocate for the State raises objection to the bail. I have taken into account the period of detention of the present petitioner as well as the materials appearing in the case diary. Having considered the overall circumstances, I am of the view that further detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted. 2 Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Allowed.

Accordingly, the petitioner viz, Amit Thakur @ Barun Thakur shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, subject to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Paschim Bardhaman. If on bail, the petitioner shall also make himself physically available on each and every date so fixed by the learned trial court or the court in seisin of the case and shall not leave the district of Paschim Bardhaman without prior permission of the learned trial court or the court in seisin of the case. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1026 of 2026 is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 3

19.08.2026 Serial no. 42 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (M) 1026 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Kulti PS Case No. 630 of 2025 dated 06.11.2025 corresponding to GR No. 3070 of 2025 u/s 81/108/61(2) of the BNS. -And- In the matter of : Amit Thakur @ Barun Thakur … Petitioner(s) Ms. Minoti Gomes Mr. A. K. Dutta … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Anurag Sardar … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for about nine months and charge-sheet has already been submitted before the learned jurisdictional court. Learned advocate also submits that the background of the case relates to a relationship between the victim (deceased) and the present petitioner. Learned advocate for the State raises objection to the bail. I have taken into account the period of detention of the present petitioner as well as the materials appearing in the case diary. Having considered the overall circumstances, I am of the view that further detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted. 2 Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Allowed.

Accordingly, the petitioner viz, Amit Thakur @ Barun Thakur shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, subject to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Paschim Bardhaman. If on bail, the petitioner shall also make himself physically available on each and every date so fixed by the learned trial court or the court in seisin of the case and shall not leave the district of Paschim Bardhaman without prior permission of the learned trial court or the court in seisin of the case. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1026 of 2026 is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 3