17.08.2026 Court No.35. D/L.265. Rakib (Rejected) CRM (A) 1813 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Murshidabad Cyber Crime Police Station case no. 04 of 2024 dated 29.06.2024 under Sections 491/420/406/120B of the Indian Penal Code. And In the matter of : Rishu Raj. ……Petitioner. Mr. Ali Ahsan Akamgri Ms. Soma Mal Ms. Rabia Khatoon Ms. June Modak Mr. D. Bose .....for the Petitioner. Mr. Suraj Mishra ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in connection with the instant case. Learned advocate appearing for the State produces the Case Diary which relate to transaction made is of questionable character. Having regard to the nature of accusations, I am of the opinion that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner may be warranted in the facts of the case. Accordingly, CRM (A) 1813 of 2026 is dismissed. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. 2 Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

17.08.2026 Court No.35. D/L.265. Rakib (Rejected) CRM (A) 1813 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Murshidabad Cyber Crime Police Station case no. 04 of 2024 dated 29.06.2024 under Sections 491/420/406/120B of the Indian Penal Code. And In the matter of : Rishu Raj. ……Petitioner. Mr. Ali Ahsan Akamgri Ms. Soma Mal Ms. Rabia Khatoon Ms. June Modak Mr. D. Bose .....for the Petitioner. Mr. Suraj Mishra ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in connection with the instant case. Learned advocate appearing for the State produces the Case Diary which relate to transaction made is of questionable character. Having regard to the nature of accusations, I am of the opinion that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner may be warranted in the facts of the case. Accordingly, CRM (A) 1813 of 2026 is dismissed. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. 2 Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)