14.08.2026 Item No. 66 Ct. No. 39 C.R.M. (A) 2001 of 2026 AN (ALLOWED) In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC corresponding to section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Suti Police Station Case No. 150 of 2023 dated 27.03.2023 under Sections 186 / 153A / 295A / 296 / 325 / 353 / 333 / 338 of the Indian Penal Code corresponding to G.R. Case No. 732 of 2023 now pending before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jangipur, Murshidabad. In the matter of : Pritam Singha … Petitioner. Mr. Debapriya Samanta Mr. Samrat Ghosh Mr. Sabyasachi Howladar Mr. Raktim Siddhanta …for the Petitioner. Mr. Somnath Adhikary …for the State. 1. Memo of evidence furnished by the S.I., Suti Police Station, Jangipur PD, dated 6th July, 2026 filed in Court today is taken on record. 2. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner prays for anticipatory bail of the petitioner on parity. He further submits that three accused persons have been granted bail by the coordinate bench of this Court on 17th April, 2026. The present petitioner is also standing on the same footing. He prays for anticipatory bail of the petitioner on any terms and conditions. 2 3. On the other hand, learned advocate representing the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 4. The C.D. is produced.

5. Having heard the learned advocates for the respective parties and upon perusal of the case diary, it appears that other co-accused persons have been granted bail by the coordinate bench of this Court. The present petitioner is also standing on the same footing. There are no previous antecedents against the present petitioner. 6. In such view of the matter, this Court does not find any necessity of custodial interrogation of the petitioner. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is considered and allowed on the following conditions. 7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer on the terms and conditions as he deems fit and proper and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 8. In the event, the petitioner fails to comply with the conditions as imposed by this Court, the prosecution shall be at liberty to pray for cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted by this Court in accordance with law. 3 9. C.R.M.(A) 2001 of 2026 stands disposed of. 10. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 11. The Department is directed to supply urgent certified Photostat copy of this order to the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all necessary formalities.

(Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.)

14.08.2026 Item No. 66 Ct. No. 39 C.R.M. (A) 2001 of 2026 AN (ALLOWED) In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC corresponding to section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Suti Police Station Case No. 150 of 2023 dated 27.03.2023 under Sections 186 / 153A / 295A / 296 / 325 / 353 / 333 / 338 of the Indian Penal Code corresponding to G.R. Case No. 732 of 2023 now pending before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jangipur, Murshidabad. In the matter of : Pritam Singha … Petitioner. Mr. Debapriya Samanta Mr. Samrat Ghosh Mr. Sabyasachi Howladar Mr. Raktim Siddhanta …for the Petitioner. Mr. Somnath Adhikary …for the State. 1. Memo of evidence furnished by the S.I., Suti Police Station, Jangipur PD, dated 6th July, 2026 filed in Court today is taken on record. 2. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner prays for anticipatory bail of the petitioner on parity. He further submits that three accused persons have been granted bail by the coordinate bench of this Court on 17th April, 2026. The present petitioner is also standing on the same footing. He prays for anticipatory bail of the petitioner on any terms and conditions. 2 3. On the other hand, learned advocate representing the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 4. The C.D. is produced.

5. Having heard the learned advocates for the respective parties and upon perusal of the case diary, it appears that other co-accused persons have been granted bail by the coordinate bench of this Court. The present petitioner is also standing on the same footing. There are no previous antecedents against the present petitioner. 6. In such view of the matter, this Court does not find any necessity of custodial interrogation of the petitioner. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is considered and allowed on the following conditions. 7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer on the terms and conditions as he deems fit and proper and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 8. In the event, the petitioner fails to comply with the conditions as imposed by this Court, the prosecution shall be at liberty to pray for cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted by this Court in accordance with law. 3 9. C.R.M.(A) 2001 of 2026 stands disposed of. 10. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 11. The Department is directed to supply urgent certified Photostat copy of this order to the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all necessary formalities.

(Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.)