14.08.2026 Serial no. 15 Court no.551 (MKP) CRM (A) 2375 of 2026 In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Nandakumar PS Case No. 195 of 2026 dated 09.05.2026 u/s 115(2)/126(2)/3(5)/303(2)/324(4)/329(4)/74/117(2)/3 51(3) of the BNS 2023. -And- In the matter of : XXXX And Anr. … Petitioner Mr. Jisan Iqubal Hossain … for the petitioner Ms. Soma Mishra Chatterjee Mr. Arindam Banerjee … for the State-respondent(s) 1. On the prayer of the learned advocate for the petitioner, anticipatory bail application is taken up for consideration. 2. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case due to property disputes between them and the complainant. 3. The learned advocate for the petitioner also submits that no incident as stated in the first information report ever occurred and the investigation of the case 2 has been concluded into a chargesheet. Other accused persons except the petitioners, have been granted bail by the learned jurisdictional Court. Learned advocate for the State relies upon the materials in the case diary including the statement of the victim as well as other witnesses. She opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

4. Learned advocate appearing for the de facto complainant submits that the petitioner has moved for cancellation of bail of the accused persons who have been granted bail by the jurisdictional Court and also submits that the petitioners are threatening the complainant as well as the witnesses of the case. 5. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for the anticipatory bail. 6. Upon perusal of the materials placed before this Court as well as materials contained in the case diary, it appears from the first information report, that there are disputes between the complainant and the petitioners in respect of landed properties. The allegations relate to forceful entry into the house of the de-facto complainant and assaulting them including a minor daughter of the de-facto complainant. 3 7. I have perused the injury report as well as the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS. 8. The investigation of the case has ended into a chargesheet. 9. In such circumstances, considering the nature of allegations as well as the materials in the case diary, prayer of the anticipatory bail is allowed.

10. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS and on further condition that petitioners shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a fortnight till the conclusion of investigation and on condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. 4 11. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is Allowed. 12. CRM (A) 2375 of 2026 is disposed of. 13. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. (Md.Shabbar Rashidi. J)

14.08.2026 Serial no. 15 Court no.551 (MKP) CRM (A) 2375 of 2026 In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Nandakumar PS Case No. 195 of 2026 dated 09.05.2026 u/s 115(2)/126(2)/3(5)/303(2)/324(4)/329(4)/74/117(2)/3 51(3) of the BNS 2023. -And- In the matter of : XXXX And Anr. … Petitioner Mr. Jisan Iqubal Hossain … for the petitioner Ms. Soma Mishra Chatterjee Mr. Arindam Banerjee … for the State-respondent(s) 1. On the prayer of the learned advocate for the petitioner, anticipatory bail application is taken up for consideration. 2. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case due to property disputes between them and the complainant. 3. The learned advocate for the petitioner also submits that no incident as stated in the first information report ever occurred and the investigation of the case 2 has been concluded into a chargesheet. Other accused persons except the petitioners, have been granted bail by the learned jurisdictional Court. Learned advocate for the State relies upon the materials in the case diary including the statement of the victim as well as other witnesses. She opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

4. Learned advocate appearing for the de facto complainant submits that the petitioner has moved for cancellation of bail of the accused persons who have been granted bail by the jurisdictional Court and also submits that the petitioners are threatening the complainant as well as the witnesses of the case. 5. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for the anticipatory bail. 6. Upon perusal of the materials placed before this Court as well as materials contained in the case diary, it appears from the first information report, that there are disputes between the complainant and the petitioners in respect of landed properties. The allegations relate to forceful entry into the house of the de-facto complainant and assaulting them including a minor daughter of the de-facto complainant. 3 7. I have perused the injury report as well as the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS. 8. The investigation of the case has ended into a chargesheet. 9. In such circumstances, considering the nature of allegations as well as the materials in the case diary, prayer of the anticipatory bail is allowed.

10. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS and on further condition that petitioners shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a fortnight till the conclusion of investigation and on condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. 4 11. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is Allowed. 12. CRM (A) 2375 of 2026 is disposed of. 13. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. (Md.Shabbar Rashidi. J)