10.10. 31.07.2026 (D/L)(D/L) CT.CT. NO.NO. 0505 (ARPAN-A.R.CT.) In The High Court at Calcutta CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 16527 OF 2026 SRI SANNYASI PRASAD RAY VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS …………… Mr. Sanjib Bandyopadhyay, Adv. …For Petitioner Mr. Partha Chakraborty, Adv. Ms. Sneha Chatterjee, Adv. …For State 1. Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of petitioner is taken on record. 2. A case is made out in this writ petition that in spite of lodging complaint with the concerned police authority steps are not being taken. 3. Learned advocate representing State respondents has filed a communication dated 21st July, 2026 of Inspector-in-Charge, Kaliganj Police Station, Nadia and same is taken on record. Copy of the said communication dated 21st July, 2026 is made over to the learned advocate representing petitioner. 4. It is disclosed in the said communication dated 21st July, 2026 that taking note of the complaint lodged by petitioner FIR is registered being Kaliganj P.S. Case No.546 of 2026 dated 18th July, 2026 under certain provisions of BNS and Section 24 of the Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and Section 15 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. 5. In view of steps taken by the concerned police authority as disclosed in the communication dated 21st [2] July, 2026, no further order need be passed on this writ petition. 6. Writ petition stands disposed of

7. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)

10.10. 31.07.2026 (D/L)(D/L) CT.CT. NO.NO. 0505 (ARPAN-A.R.CT.) In The High Court at Calcutta CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 16527 OF 2026 SRI SANNYASI PRASAD RAY VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS …………… Mr. Sanjib Bandyopadhyay, Adv. …For Petitioner Mr. Partha Chakraborty, Adv. Ms. Sneha Chatterjee, Adv. …For State 1. Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of petitioner is taken on record. 2. A case is made out in this writ petition that in spite of lodging complaint with the concerned police authority steps are not being taken. 3. Learned advocate representing State respondents has filed a communication dated 21st July, 2026 of Inspector-in-Charge, Kaliganj Police Station, Nadia and same is taken on record. Copy of the said communication dated 21st July, 2026 is made over to the learned advocate representing petitioner. 4. It is disclosed in the said communication dated 21st July, 2026 that taking note of the complaint lodged by petitioner FIR is registered being Kaliganj P.S. Case No.546 of 2026 dated 18th July, 2026 under certain provisions of BNS and Section 24 of the Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and Section 15 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. 5. In view of steps taken by the concerned police authority as disclosed in the communication dated 21st [2] July, 2026, no further order need be passed on this writ petition. 6. Writ petition stands disposed of

7. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)