31.07.2026 In The High Court at Calcutta Ct. No. 38 Special Civil Jurisdiction Sl. No. 9 Appellate Side Contempt Moumita CPAN 1725 of 2025 in WPA 22418 of 2025 Shubhankar Sarkar and Ors. -Vs.- Shri Shailendra Uttam, The Regional Director (E.R.) Staff Selection Commission and Ors. Mr. Debasish Kundu, Adv. Mr. Sudeepto Kumar Basu, Adv. Ms. Doyel Dey, Adv. …For the Petitioners Mr. Tapan Bhanja, Adv. ….For the Alleged Contemnors Mr. Debasish Kundu, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners have strongly and vehemently submit that, the direction of this Court has not been complied with, as such the alleged contemnors are guilty of contempt and should be punished accordingly. At this juncture, Mr. Tapan Bhanja, learned Advocate appearing for the alleged contemnors submit a compliance report by way of an affidavit, the same is taken on record. Copy has been made over to Mr. Kundu, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner. 2 Page 5 of the compliance report shows that, the petitioner no. 4 in this contempt proceeding has already been communicated that, his Detail Medical Examination (DME) has been fixed today. In view of the above, nothing further survives in this contempt proceeding. Accordingly, CPAN 1725 of 2025 stands dropped and closed. The application CPAN 1725 of 2025 stands disposed of, without any order as to costs. (Aniruddha Roy, J.)

31.07.2026 In The High Court at Calcutta Ct. No. 38 Special Civil Jurisdiction Sl. No. 9 Appellate Side Contempt Moumita CPAN 1725 of 2025 in WPA 22418 of 2025 Shubhankar Sarkar and Ors. -Vs.- Shri Shailendra Uttam, The Regional Director (E.R.) Staff Selection Commission and Ors. Mr. Debasish Kundu, Adv. Mr. Sudeepto Kumar Basu, Adv. Ms. Doyel Dey, Adv. …For the Petitioners Mr. Tapan Bhanja, Adv. ….For the Alleged Contemnors Mr. Debasish Kundu, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners have strongly and vehemently submit that, the direction of this Court has not been complied with, as such the alleged contemnors are guilty of contempt and should be punished accordingly. At this juncture, Mr. Tapan Bhanja, learned Advocate appearing for the alleged contemnors submit a compliance report by way of an affidavit, the same is taken on record. Copy has been made over to Mr. Kundu, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner. 2 Page 5 of the compliance report shows that, the petitioner no. 4 in this contempt proceeding has already been communicated that, his Detail Medical Examination (DME) has been fixed today. In view of the above, nothing further survives in this contempt proceeding. Accordingly, CPAN 1725 of 2025 stands dropped and closed. The application CPAN 1725 of 2025 stands disposed of, without any order as to costs. (Aniruddha Roy, J.)