Calcutta High Court
Soma Biswas v. State of West Bengal & Ors.
WPA/7761/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-07-30
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Saugata Bhattacharyya
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
78 30.07.2026 Ct. No. 05 adeb WPA 7761 of 2026 Soma Biswas Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Niladri Sekhar Ghosh Mr. Mukul Biswas Ms. Labani Sikdar Mr. Souvik Dey ….for the petitioner Mr. Suryaneel Das Ms. Suchitra Sinha Chatterjee Ms. Sumita Sarkar …for the State Mr. Dipankar Mondal …for the respondent no. 7 1. Mr. Suryaneel Das, learned Additional Government Pleader representing State respondents has filed a communication dated 30th July, 2026 of Officer-in-Charge, Gangnapur Police Station, Nadia and same is taken on record. Copy of the said communication dated 30th July, 2026 is made over to the learned advocate representing petitioner. 2. Learned advocate representing petitioner made submissions on earlier occasion that petitioner belongs to Scheduled Caste community. Therefore, steps are required to be taken based on the complaint made by the petitioner 2 in terms of relevant previsions of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter to as ‘said Act of 1989’). 3. It is contended on behalf of State respondents in reference to contents of communication dated 30th July, 2026 filed today that on preliminary enquiry taking note of the complaint of petitioner FIR is registered being Gangnapur P.S. Case No. 190 of 2026 dated 25th July, 2026 under Section 351(2) BNS and Section 3(1)(s) of said Act of 1989.
4. It is also disclosed in the communication that Deputy Superintendent of Police (Border) of Ranaghat Police District is entrusted with the responsibility to act as Investigating Officer. 5. In view of aforesaid steps taken by the concerned police authorities it appears that these are in consonance with the relevant provisions of said Act of 1989. 6. Hence, no further order need be passed on this writ petition. 7. Writ petition stands disposed of. 8. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)