D/L.30. July 29, 2026. KAUSHIK. FAT 2187 of 1987 State LAC Vs. Pashupati Paul None appears on behalf of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. This matter was appearing in the Warning List and the appellant had sufficient notice that the same would be taken up for hearing. In view of the non-appearance of the appellant, FAT 2187 of 1987 stands dismissed for default. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. (Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.) (Chaitali Chatterjee (Das), J.)

D/L.30. July 29, 2026. KAUSHIK. FAT 2187 of 1987 State LAC Vs. Pashupati Paul None appears on behalf of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. This matter was appearing in the Warning List and the appellant had sufficient notice that the same would be taken up for hearing. In view of the non-appearance of the appellant, FAT 2187 of 1987 stands dismissed for default. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. (Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.) (Chaitali Chatterjee (Das), J.)