29.07.2026 Item No.15 Court No.11 (GB) Calcutta High Court In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri CRM (A) 549 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under section 482 of the B.N.S.S. 2023, in connection with Tufanganj Police Station Case No.345 of 2026 dated 14.06.2026 under Sections 64/62 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of: Chan Miah Seikh @ Chan Miah ….Petitioner. Mr. Swarup Das …for the Petitioner. Ms. Panchali Deb Sikder (Nag), Mr. Sanjay Mazoomdar, Mr. Arko Sarkar … for the State. Mr. Bikash Singha … for the De facto complainant. 1. The petitioner prays for pre-arrest bail in connection with Tufanganj Police Station Case No.345 of 2026 dated 14.06.2026 under Sections 64/62 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, on the ground of false implication. 2. The learned advocates for the State and the de facto complainant oppose the prayer for anticipatory bail. 3. Having considered the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 BNSS before learned Judicial Magistrate and the materials on record, especially the refusal by the victim to undergo any medical examination, prayer for pre-arrest bail is allowed. 4. Accordingly, this Court directs that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of the whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to 2

the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The further condition is that the petitioner shall meet the investigating officer once a week and shall not enter the jurisdiction of Tufanganj Police Station except for the purpose of meeting the investigating officer. The petitioner shall not contact with the victim either physically or via telephone or via digital platform. The petitioner will inform the investigating officer of his place of stay. 5. In case the petitioner fails to adhere to any of the conditions as stated above, the anticipatory bail will stand automatically cancelled. 6. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is allowed and disposed of. 7. Parties are directed to act on the basis of the server copy of this order. (Shampa Sarkar, J.)

29.07.2026 Item No.15 Court No.11 (GB) Calcutta High Court In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri CRM (A) 549 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under section 482 of the B.N.S.S. 2023, in connection with Tufanganj Police Station Case No.345 of 2026 dated 14.06.2026 under Sections 64/62 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of: Chan Miah Seikh @ Chan Miah ….Petitioner. Mr. Swarup Das …for the Petitioner. Ms. Panchali Deb Sikder (Nag), Mr. Sanjay Mazoomdar, Mr. Arko Sarkar … for the State. Mr. Bikash Singha … for the De facto complainant. 1. The petitioner prays for pre-arrest bail in connection with Tufanganj Police Station Case No.345 of 2026 dated 14.06.2026 under Sections 64/62 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, on the ground of false implication. 2. The learned advocates for the State and the de facto complainant oppose the prayer for anticipatory bail. 3. Having considered the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 BNSS before learned Judicial Magistrate and the materials on record, especially the refusal by the victim to undergo any medical examination, prayer for pre-arrest bail is allowed. 4. Accordingly, this Court directs that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of the whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to 2

the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The further condition is that the petitioner shall meet the investigating officer once a week and shall not enter the jurisdiction of Tufanganj Police Station except for the purpose of meeting the investigating officer. The petitioner shall not contact with the victim either physically or via telephone or via digital platform. The petitioner will inform the investigating officer of his place of stay. 5. In case the petitioner fails to adhere to any of the conditions as stated above, the anticipatory bail will stand automatically cancelled. 6. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is allowed and disposed of. 7. Parties are directed to act on the basis of the server copy of this order. (Shampa Sarkar, J.)