1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA [ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ] *** AP/6/2026 M/s Royal Fancy Store Vs. Andaman And Nicobar Islands Integrated Development Corporation Limited (ANIIDCO) and others Ms. Vinita Devi … for the petitioner Mr. Rakesh Kumar … for the respondents July 29, 2026 [SR] Item No.6 1. The subject application under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is for appointment of arbitrator to decide the disputes and differences that arose between the parties for supply of “Tetra Pack Toned Milk” at a particular rate awarded to the applicant vide letter of acceptance dated 5th July, 2024. There is an arbitration clause in the LoA under heading other terms and conditions, against point no.(v). 2. In that view of the matter, this Court is inclined to appoint Mr. Arul Prasanth, learned advocate as an arbitrator to enter upon the reference and decide the matter in terms of the Act of 1996 and Rules framed thereunder. 3. The fees of the arbitrator shall also be in terms of the aforesaid Act of 1996 and Rules framed thereunder or as may be agreed between the parties. 4. With the aforesaid observations, AP/6/2026 stands disposed of 2 5. All parties are directed to act on a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. ( Rajasekhar Mantha, J. )

1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA [ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ] *** AP/6/2026 M/s Royal Fancy Store Vs. Andaman And Nicobar Islands Integrated Development Corporation Limited (ANIIDCO) and others Ms. Vinita Devi … for the petitioner Mr. Rakesh Kumar … for the respondents July 29, 2026 [SR] Item No.6 1. The subject application under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is for appointment of arbitrator to decide the disputes and differences that arose between the parties for supply of “Tetra Pack Toned Milk” at a particular rate awarded to the applicant vide letter of acceptance dated 5th July, 2024. There is an arbitration clause in the LoA under heading other terms and conditions, against point no.(v). 2. In that view of the matter, this Court is inclined to appoint Mr. Arul Prasanth, learned advocate as an arbitrator to enter upon the reference and decide the matter in terms of the Act of 1996 and Rules framed thereunder. 3. The fees of the arbitrator shall also be in terms of the aforesaid Act of 1996 and Rules framed thereunder or as may be agreed between the parties. 4. With the aforesaid observations, AP/6/2026 stands disposed of 2 5. All parties are directed to act on a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. ( Rajasekhar Mantha, J. )