24.07.2026 Ct. No. 30 S.L. No. 6 SM WPA 17680 of 2026 BTL EPC Ltd. (Formerly Bengal Tools Ltd.) Versus The State of West Bengal & Anr. Ms. Debanwita Pramanik …….for the petitioner Mr. Ravi Kumar Dubey ……for the respondent no. 2 Ms. Susmita Saha Dutta, ld. AGP Ms. Madhurima Basu …….for the State 1. Affidavit-of-service filed be kept with the record. 2. The writ application has been filed being aggrieved by a judgment dated 19th May, 2026 passed by the Learned Second Labour Court, West Bengal in Computation Case No. 18 of 2018. 3. Vide the impugned order the learned Tribunal passed an order as follows:-“Hence, it is ORDERED That the Computation Case being No. 18 of 2018 of the applicant is allowed partly on contest. The O.P. is herein directed to pay Rs. 22,153/- and (692.30 x 90 days) i.e. Rs. 62,307/- as Salary and Leave Encashment respectively to the applicant with 10% interest from the date of application till date of actual realization within sixty (60) days, in default, O.P. is at liberty to take recourse of law.” 2 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the writ petitioner was represented initially before the Labour Court but as subsequently the learned counsels failed to appear the petitioner’s case was not considered by the Labour Court. 5. Learned counsels for the State and the private respondents submit that the impugned order has been passed only to the extent admitted by the petitioner themselves.

6. The written statement filed by the petitioner/company before the Labour Court is placed before this Court and it appears that the Labour Court vide the impugned order has granted relief only to the extent as admitted by the petitioner herein in the said written statement at part (ii) 4 (B). The Labour Court has not granted any other relief other than the amount admitted in the written statement of the company herein. 7. Accordingly, this Court finds no merit in the writ application and the same is dismissed. 8. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings. [Shampa Dutt (Paul). J]

24.07.2026 Ct. No. 30 S.L. No. 6 SM WPA 17680 of 2026 BTL EPC Ltd. (Formerly Bengal Tools Ltd.) Versus The State of West Bengal & Anr. Ms. Debanwita Pramanik …….for the petitioner Mr. Ravi Kumar Dubey ……for the respondent no. 2 Ms. Susmita Saha Dutta, ld. AGP Ms. Madhurima Basu …….for the State 1. Affidavit-of-service filed be kept with the record. 2. The writ application has been filed being aggrieved by a judgment dated 19th May, 2026 passed by the Learned Second Labour Court, West Bengal in Computation Case No. 18 of 2018. 3. Vide the impugned order the learned Tribunal passed an order as follows:-“Hence, it is ORDERED That the Computation Case being No. 18 of 2018 of the applicant is allowed partly on contest. The O.P. is herein directed to pay Rs. 22,153/- and (692.30 x 90 days) i.e. Rs. 62,307/- as Salary and Leave Encashment respectively to the applicant with 10% interest from the date of application till date of actual realization within sixty (60) days, in default, O.P. is at liberty to take recourse of law.” 2 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the writ petitioner was represented initially before the Labour Court but as subsequently the learned counsels failed to appear the petitioner’s case was not considered by the Labour Court. 5. Learned counsels for the State and the private respondents submit that the impugned order has been passed only to the extent admitted by the petitioner themselves.

6. The written statement filed by the petitioner/company before the Labour Court is placed before this Court and it appears that the Labour Court vide the impugned order has granted relief only to the extent as admitted by the petitioner herein in the said written statement at part (ii) 4 (B). The Labour Court has not granted any other relief other than the amount admitted in the written statement of the company herein. 7. Accordingly, this Court finds no merit in the writ application and the same is dismissed. 8. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings. [Shampa Dutt (Paul). J]