22.07.2026 Ct. No. 17 Sl. No. 19 RANJAN FAT 139 of 2008 TANIYA DAKUA VS. MANOJ DUTTA None appears on behalf of either of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. The appeal had appeared on an earlier occasion i.e. on 08.07.2026 when neither of the parties were represented. In view of the repeated non-appearance of the parties, FAT 139 of 2008 stands dismissed for default. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. [RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.] [CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS), J.]

22.07.2026 Ct. No. 17 Sl. No. 19 RANJAN FAT 139 of 2008 TANIYA DAKUA VS. MANOJ DUTTA None appears on behalf of either of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. The appeal had appeared on an earlier occasion i.e. on 08.07.2026 when neither of the parties were represented. In view of the repeated non-appearance of the parties, FAT 139 of 2008 stands dismissed for default. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. [RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.] [CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS), J.]