D/L.39. July 22, 2026. KAUSHIK. FAT 1127 of 1986 Madan Lal Mandelia Vs. Sitaram Mandelia None appears on behalf of either of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. This matter had been appearing in the Warning List and the parties are deemed to have had sufficient notice that the matter would be taken up for hearing today. A Report filed by the Department indicates that despite efforts, the records of this proceeding are not traceable. In view of the above, FAT 1127 of 1986 stands dismissed for default. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. The Department is directed to take necessary steps forthwith. (Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.) (Chaitali Chatterjee (Das), J.)

D/L.39. July 22, 2026. KAUSHIK. FAT 1127 of 1986 Madan Lal Mandelia Vs. Sitaram Mandelia None appears on behalf of either of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. This matter had been appearing in the Warning List and the parties are deemed to have had sufficient notice that the matter would be taken up for hearing today. A Report filed by the Department indicates that despite efforts, the records of this proceeding are not traceable. In view of the above, FAT 1127 of 1986 stands dismissed for default. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. The Department is directed to take necessary steps forthwith. (Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.) (Chaitali Chatterjee (Das), J.)