25.25. 20.07.2026 (D/L)(D/L) CT.CT. NO.NO. 0505 (ARPAN-A.R.CT.) In The High Court at Calcutta CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 15584 OF 2026 MD. SARJU ALAM VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS …………… Mr. Souma Subhra Roy, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Patra, Adv. Ms. Neelam Kumari, Adv. …For the Petitioner Mr. Debashis Basu, Adv. Mrs. Aparna Samanta (Kumar), Adv. …For the State 1. At the time of call learned advocate representing the petitioner on instruction submits that petitioner is willing to withdraw the writ petition. 2. State respondents are represented by learned advocates. 3. In view of aforesaid submission made on behalf of the petitioner, writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)

25.25. 20.07.2026 (D/L)(D/L) CT.CT. NO.NO. 0505 (ARPAN-A.R.CT.) In The High Court at Calcutta CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 15584 OF 2026 MD. SARJU ALAM VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS …………… Mr. Souma Subhra Roy, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Patra, Adv. Ms. Neelam Kumari, Adv. …For the Petitioner Mr. Debashis Basu, Adv. Mrs. Aparna Samanta (Kumar), Adv. …For the State 1. At the time of call learned advocate representing the petitioner on instruction submits that petitioner is willing to withdraw the writ petition. 2. State respondents are represented by learned advocates. 3. In view of aforesaid submission made on behalf of the petitioner, writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)