D/L449 15.07.2026 Bpg. C.R.M. (M) 1210 of 2026 Allowed In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 corresponding to Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed in connection with Anandapur Police Station Case No.194 of 2022 dated 09.11.2022 under Sections 302/201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Bijoy Boral Versus The State of West Bengal Mr. Aniket Mitra Mrs. Sonakshi Mitra Mr. Prasenjit Jana. …for the petitioner. Mr. Amal Kumar Datta. …for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 3 years 8 months and till date out of 17 witnesses cited by the prosecution 3 witnesses have been examined. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail. I have taken into account the materials appearing against the present petitioner who is father of the deceased. Assessing his complicity in the alleged offence although there are materials under Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code but so far other materials are concerned, the same is obviously subject to cross-examination of rest of the witnesses who are yet to be placed 2 before the court.

Having considered the period of detention of the present petitioner, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. The petitioner, namely, Bijoy Boral shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Alipore, 24 Parganas (South). If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned trial court and shall not leave the district of 24 Parganas (South) without prior permission of the learned trial court. Accordingly, CRM(M)1210 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of Evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

D/L449 15.07.2026 Bpg. C.R.M. (M) 1210 of 2026 Allowed In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 corresponding to Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed in connection with Anandapur Police Station Case No.194 of 2022 dated 09.11.2022 under Sections 302/201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Bijoy Boral Versus The State of West Bengal Mr. Aniket Mitra Mrs. Sonakshi Mitra Mr. Prasenjit Jana. …for the petitioner. Mr. Amal Kumar Datta. …for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 3 years 8 months and till date out of 17 witnesses cited by the prosecution 3 witnesses have been examined. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail. I have taken into account the materials appearing against the present petitioner who is father of the deceased. Assessing his complicity in the alleged offence although there are materials under Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code but so far other materials are concerned, the same is obviously subject to cross-examination of rest of the witnesses who are yet to be placed 2 before the court.

Having considered the period of detention of the present petitioner, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. The petitioner, namely, Bijoy Boral shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Alipore, 24 Parganas (South). If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned trial court and shall not leave the district of 24 Parganas (South) without prior permission of the learned trial court. Accordingly, CRM(M)1210 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of Evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)