14.07.2026 In the High Court at CalcuttaSl. No. DL 475 Court No. 35 Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Asraf, A.R.(Ct.) Case No. CRM (M) 1187 of 2026 In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 corresponding to Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed in connection with Petrapole Police Station case no.145 of 2024 dated 29.10.2024 under Sections 319(2), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 14 of the Foreigners Act, 1946. -AND- In the matter of : ASHIS RAJBONSHI @ ASHIS RAJBANSHI ……Petitioner For the Petitioner : Mr. Samaruddha Das …Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajendra Banerjee Mr. Sanjib Das …Advocates 1. Earlier there was a direction by this Court while rejecting the bail prayer of the present petitioner in CRM(M) 1867 of 2025. 2. In view of the aforesaid, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected and CRM(M) 1187 of 2026 is dismissed at this stage. 3. Memo of evidence filed by the State be kept with the record. 4. Case diary be returned to the learned advocate appearing for the State. Page 2 5. All parties shall act on the basis of server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 6. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all necessary formalities. ( Tirthankar Ghosh, J. )

14.07.2026 In the High Court at CalcuttaSl. No. DL 475 Court No. 35 Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Asraf, A.R.(Ct.) Case No. CRM (M) 1187 of 2026 In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 corresponding to Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed in connection with Petrapole Police Station case no.145 of 2024 dated 29.10.2024 under Sections 319(2), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 14 of the Foreigners Act, 1946. -AND- In the matter of : ASHIS RAJBONSHI @ ASHIS RAJBANSHI ……Petitioner For the Petitioner : Mr. Samaruddha Das …Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajendra Banerjee Mr. Sanjib Das …Advocates 1. Earlier there was a direction by this Court while rejecting the bail prayer of the present petitioner in CRM(M) 1867 of 2025. 2. In view of the aforesaid, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected and CRM(M) 1187 of 2026 is dismissed at this stage. 3. Memo of evidence filed by the State be kept with the record. 4. Case diary be returned to the learned advocate appearing for the State. Page 2 5. All parties shall act on the basis of server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 6. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all necessary formalities. ( Tirthankar Ghosh, J. )